Federalism in 3D: The Reimagination of Political Community in the European Union

Main Article Content

Neil Walker

Resumo

No presente artigo, explanam-se as virtudes da perspetiva federal em relação a significativos e recentes desenvolvimentos na política territorial 3D da UE (ou seja, subestado, estado, supranacional). Defendo que, devido à sua herança estatista, a invocação do federalismo, considerada quer como uma técnica de governo ou como uma expressão direta de uma relação afetiva entre as pessoas e política supranacional, é limitada ou mesmo um valor negativo na UE. No entanto, o federalismo, uma vez exploradas as suas raízes históricas mais profundas e entendido como base de reflexão imaginativa sobre a natureza e trajetória de uma configuração política sem precedentes, afigura-se bastante melhor. Neste ponto, a imaginação federal continua a desafiar a perspetiva soberana com a sua ênfase na autoridade última dos níveis estaduais ou supranacionais, mas fá-lo com efeitos complexos, imprevisíveis e não definitivos, devido à forte atração que a perspetiva soberana ainda exerce. Relativamente a esta questão, focar-me-ei num tópico particular e numa parte desafiadora do puzzle federal europeu. Concentrar-me-ei na terceira dimensão subestadual da estrutura federal 3D da UE, tal como se tem vivenciado nos recentes desenvolvimentos na Escócia e na Catalunha, e sobre a forma como o desenvolvimento de exemplo federal imaginativo da UE deverá e poderá alterar o espírito em que as novas reivindicações de soberania realizadas e recebidas.

Palavras-chave: Política territorial 3D da União Europeia, Subestado, estado, supranacional, Imaginação federal, Configuração política

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Avbelj, M., “Theory of European Union”, European Law Review, vol. 35, 2011, pp. 818-36.

Beaud, O., Théorie de la Fédération, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 2007.

Bell, C., “What we talk about when we talk about international constitutional law”, Transnational Legal Theory, vol. 5, 2004, pp. 241-284.

Bengoetxea, J., “Autonomous Constitutional Regions in a Federal Europe”, in Federalism in the European Union, E. Cloots, G. De Baere and S. Sottiaux (eds.), Hart, Oxford, 2013, pp. 230-48.

Beran, H., “A Democratic Theory of Political Self-Determination for a New World Order”, in Theories of Secession, P. Lehning (ed.), Routledge, London, 1998, pp. 32-59.

Borriello, A./Crespy, A., “How to not speak the F- word: Federalism between mirage and imperative in the euro crisis”, European Journal of Political Research, vol. 54, 2015, pp. 502-524.

Buchanan, Allen, Justice, Legitimacy and self-determination, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004.

Burgess, M., Federalism and European Union: The Building of Europe, 1950-2000, Routledge, London, 2000.

Dehousse, R., “European Institutional Architecture After Amsterdam: Parliamentary System or Regulatory Structure?”, Common Market Law Review, vol. 35, 1998, pp. 595-627.

Douglas-Scott, S., “British Withdrawal from the EU: An existential threat to the United Kingdom?”, Scottish Constitutional Futures Forum Blog, October 2014.

Drake, H., Jacques Delores: Perspectives on a European Leader, Routledge, London, 2000.

Edward, David, “Scotland and the European Union”, Scottish Constitutional Futures Forum Blog December 2012.

Elazar, D., Constitutionalizing Globalization: The Postmodern Revival of Confederal Arrangements, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, 2008.

Elazar, D., “The Significance of Federalism in Redesigning Constitutional Systems”, Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs.

Elazar, D., “The United States and the European Union: Models for their epochs”, in The Federal Vision, K. Nicolaidis and R. Howse (eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001, pp. 31-53.

Fabbrini, S., Compound Democracies: Why the United States and Europe are Becoming Similar, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007.

Ferreres Cornella, V., “The Spanish Constitutional Court Confronts Catalonia’s ‘Right to Decide’ (Comment on the Judgment 42/2014)”, European Constitutional Law Review, vol. 10, 2014, pp. 571-590.

Follesdal, A., Federalism Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

García Oliva, “Catalonia in Spain: The Significance of the 25th September 2015 Elections”, UK Constitutional Law association Blog.

Glencross, A., What Makes the EU Viable? European Integration in the Light of the US Antebellum Experience, Basingstoke, MacMillan, 2009.

Hueglin, T./ Fenna, A., Comparative Federalism: A Systematic Inquiry, Broadview Press, Peterborough, 2006.

Klabbers, J., “The Right to be Taken Seriously: Self-Determination in International Law”, Human Rights Quarterly, vol. 28, 2006, pp. 186-206.

Law, J., “How Can we Define Federalism?”, Perspectives on Federalism, vol. 5, number 2, 2013, pp. 89-120.

Mancini, S., “Secession and Self-Determination”, in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law, M. Rosenfeld and A. Sajo (eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 481-500.

McCormick, J., Questioning Sovereignty: Law, State and Nation in the European Commonwealth, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999.

McCormick, J., European Union Politics, Palgrave, Basingstoke, 2011.

McKay, D., Designing Europe: Comparative Lessons from the Federal Experience, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001.

Norman, W., Negotiating Nationalism; Nation Building, Federalism and Secession in the Multinational State, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006.

Patten, A., “Democratic Secession from a Multinational State”, Ethics, vol. 112, 2002, pp. 558-586.

Philpott, D., “In Defense of Self-Determination”, Ethics, vol. 105, 1995, pp. 352-85.

Philpott, D., “Self-Determination in Practice”, in National Self-Determination and Secession, M. Moore (ed.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998, pp. 79-102.

Piris, J. C., “The European Union: Towards a New Form of Federalism?”, in Patterns of Regionalism and Federalism: Lessons for the UK, J. Fedtke and B. Markesinis (eds.), Hart, Oxford, 2006, pp. 69-87.

Schmitter, P., “If the Nation-State Were to Wither away in Europe, What Might Replace It?”, in The Future of the Nation State, S. Gustavsson and L. Lewin (eds.), Nerenius & SanteYus, Stockhom, 1996, pp. 90-131.

Schütze, R., European Constitutional Law, Cambridge University Press, 2012.

Scott, A., “An Independent Scotland Could not be required to adopt the Euro as its Currency”, Scottish Constitutional Futures Forum Blog, November 2012.

Walker, N., “Beyond Secession? Law in the Framing of the National Polity”, in Nationalism and Globalisation, S. Tierney (ed.), Hart, Oxford, 2015, pp. 155-84.

Walker, N., “Constitutional Pluralism Revisited”, European Law Journal, vol. 26, number 4, 2016 (forthcoming).

Walker, N., “Hijacking the Debate”, Scottish Constitutional Futures Forum Blog, February 2015.

Walker, N., “Internal enlargement in the European Union: beyond Legalism and Political Expediency”, in Troubled Membership in the European Union, C. Closa (ed.), forthcoming, Cambridge University Press, 2016).

Walker, N., “Scotland and the EU: A Comment”, Verfassungsblog, September 2015.

Walker, N., “Subsidiarity and the Deracination of Political Community”, SSRN (2015).

Walker, N., “The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism”, Modern Law Review, vol. 65, 2002, pp. 317-59.

Wallace, W., “Government Without Statehood: The Unstable Equilibrium”, in Policy-making in the European Union, H. Wallace and W. Wallace (eds.), Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1996, pp. 439-60.

Watts, R., “Federalism, Federal Political Systems and Federations”, Annual Review of Political Science, 1, 1998, pp. 117-37.

Weiler, Joseph, “Catalonian Independence and the European Union”, European Journal of International Law, vol. 23, 2012, pp. 909-913.

Weiler, Joseph, “Scotland and the EU: A Comment”, Verfassungsblog, September 2015.

Wellman, C., “A Defence of Secession and Political Self-Determination”, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 24, 1995, pp. 142-171.