Proposals submitted pass through the review process of, at least, 3 reviewers in molds of anonymity.

The reviewers are experts in the areas of intervention of the magazine and are responsible for validating the scientific content of the proposals submitted, as well as compliance with the format specifications and layout.

The final decision of acceptance or rejection of the proposal belongs to the Editor.

The main reasons why a proposal may be accepted are:

- Relevance within the Social Pedagogy;
- Original article or with great development of research;
- Format, structure or style suitable with the required and provided by the magazine;
- Quality of writing and graphic elements throughout the text;
- Page limit respected.