The concept of “original” in Conservation Theory Fake? The Art of Deception revisited

Main Article Content

Salomé de Carvalho
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1669-8883

Abstract

There are several blurry questions in contemporary Conservation Theory. Remarkable contributions from the past now seem insufficient and a stronger theoretical structure is required. Conservators and restorers rely blindly on concepts taken for granted; such is the example of “original” which is the basis of so many decisions and intervention methodologies. Do we really understand the meaning of “original” and why it is so important to our work? What consequences may derive from the misinterpretation of this concept? This paper proposes an approach to the term “original”, seeking answers in a historic analysis, revisiting a remarkable publication by the British Museum, Fake? The Art of Deception, a catalogue from a 1951 exhibition re-published in 1990. In opposition to “original”, we aim to analyze the relationship Man has had with fakes, forgeries and copies over time and how they can be helpful when defining “original”.

Keywords: Contemporary conservation theory, Original, Fakes, Copies, Forgeries, Restoration

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BLACKMAN, Christabel. New Horizons for Conservation Thinking: Interview made to Salvador Muñoz-Viñas. In E-Conservation Magazine (number 6, September 2008).

BOESE, Alex. «Renaissance Forgeries». 2008 [consult: 25.05.2010]. http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/Hoaxipedia/Renaissance_Forgeries/

CALVO MANUEL, Ana. Conservación y restauración: Materiales, técnicas y procedimientos. De la A a la Z. Barcelona: Ediciones del Serbal, 2003. P. 160. Freemanart Consultancy Archives. [Consult 05.05.2010]. http://www.freemanart.ca/greatest_art_forgers_fakers.htm

Infopedia website. [Consult 05.05.2010]. http://www.infopedia.pt/lingua-portuguesa/original

JONES, Mark (ed.) Fake? The Art of Deception. London: British Museum Publications, 1990.

JONES, Mark. The Charms of Deception. In: The New York Review. Nova Iorque, (31 de Janeiro de 1991).

Lascaux website. [Consult 07.05.2010]. http://www.lascaux.culture.fr/index.php#/fr/chrono.xml

MUNOZ VINAS, Salvador. Contemporary Theory of Conservation. Oxford: Elsevier, 2005.

TUBELLA, Patricia. No es un ‘gauguin’, es un ‘greenhalgh’. In: El País (Domingo, 23 de Dezembro de 2007). P. 12.

Van Meegeren website. [Consult 07.05.2010]. http://www.meegeren.net/

WATSON, Peter. Masters in the art of copying. In: The Observer. Londres (Domingo, 25 Setembro 1994). P. 16.