Art, error, and the interstices of power
Main Article Content
Abstract
The artistic use of error has a long history, and this essay attempts to reconstruct the genealogy of the relationship between artists and error. It then goes on to analyze the characteristics of technological error used in art along with the reasons for its appreciation by media artists and media activists. Finally, it contextualizes the practices of media art and media activism taken as exemplars in questions bound to contemporary technological power. The aim of this theoretical trajectory is to understand how error is used, for what purposes, and with what outcomes. Further, its goal is to determine whether and how the current popularity of technological error is bound to a certain relationship with technological power,[1] the characteristics of which are control,[2] regulation, prevention, and normalization.
Downloads
References
Breton, A. (1974). L’amour fou. Turin: Einaudi; quoted in Chéroux, C. (2009). L’errore fotografico. Una breve storia. Turin: Einaudi, 85.
Brighenti, A. M. (2010). “Artveillance: At the Crossroads of Art and Surveillance,” p. 175-186; in Eds. McGrath J., & Sweeny R. (Ed.), Surveillance & Society, Special Issue on Surveillance, Performance and New Media Art, vol.7, n°2. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v7i2.4142
Chéroux, C. (2009). L’errore fotografico. Una breve storia. Turin: Einaudi.
Eco, U. (1989). Opera Aperta. Milan: Fabbri Editori.
Fenwick, T., & Richard E. (2010). Actor-Network Theory in Education. London – New York: Routledge.
Grant Ward, C., (2012) “Stock Imagery, Filler Content, Semantic Ambiguity,” p. 102; chapter in Nunes, M. (2012). Error, Glitch, Noise and Jam in New Media Cultures. 1st ed. New York: Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781628927924.ch-005
Gschrey, R. Contemporary Closed Circuits – Subversive Dialogues: Artistic Strategies against Surveillance. In McGrath J. and Sweeny R. (Ed.), Surveillance & Society, Special Issue on Surveillance, Performance and New Media Art. Eds., vol.7, n°2, 163. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v7i2.4140
Gurvitch, G. (1997). Il controllo sociale. Rome: Armando Editore, 30; quoted in Ragnedda, M. (2008). La società postpanottica. Controllo sociale e nuovi media. Rome: Aracne, 23
Lessing, G. (1969). Laocoön: An Essay on the Limits of Painting and Poetry. New York: Farrar Strauss and Giroux.
Mayer, M. (2005). Googlebombing Failure in The Official Google Blog, blog entry, eptember 16, 2005 http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2005/09/googlebombing-failure.html; quoted in Nunes, M. (2012). Error, Glitch, Noise and Jam in New Media Cultures. 1st ed. New York: Bloomsbury, 16.
Moholy-Nagy, L. (1929). Photographie, mise en forme de la lumière. Cahiers d’art, Paris, n. 1. Reprinted in Various Authors, László Moholy-Nagy, Composititions lumineuses, 1922-1943. Paris: Centre Pompidou, 1995; Chéroux, C. (2009). L’errore fotografico. Una breve storia. Turin: Einaudi, 63.
Moholy-Nagy, L. (1932). Où va la photographie? Agfa Photoblätter, n. 9, Reprinted in Various Authors, (1995) László Moholy-Nagy, Composititions lumineuses, 1922-1943. Paris: Centre Pompidou, p. 199; quoted in Chéroux, C. (2009). L’errore fotografico. Una breve storia. Turin: Einaudi, 63.
Moradi, I., Ant S., Gilmore, J., & Murphy, C., (2009). Glitch: Designing Imperfection. New York: Mark Batty.
Moradi, S. (2004). Glitch Aesthetics. BA Thesis in Multimedia Design, School of Design Technology, Department of Architecture, The University of Huddersfield.
Narduzzi, E. (2004). Sesto potere: Chi governa la societa nell’era della tecnologia di massa e dell’innovazione permanente. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.
Nunes, M. (2012). Error, Glitch, Noise and Jam in New Media Cultures. 1st ed. New York: Bloomsbury.
Peplin, E. (2012). Dirty New Media. Chicago: independent publication, http://gl1tch.us/DirtyNewMedia.html.
Revault d’Allones, O., & Bouissou D., (Ed.), (1978). Francis Picabia, Écrites, 1921-1953 et posthumes. Paris: Belfond; quoted in Chéroux, C. (2009). L’errore fotografico. Una breve storia. Turin: Einaudi, 85.
Rieger, F. (2005). We lost the war. Welcome to the world of tomorrow. Die datenschleuder – das wissenschaftliche fachblatt für datenreisende – ein organ des chaos computer club, n°89, p. 63; quoted in McGrath J., & Sweeny R. (Ed.), Surveillance & Society, Special Issue on Surveillance, Performance and New Media Art. Eds., vol.7, n°2, 163.
Riout, D. (2002). L’arte del ventesimo secolo. Protagonisti, temi, correnti. Turin: Einaudi.
Roberts, J. (2011). The Necessity of Errors. London-New York: Verso.
Santayana, G. (1982). Reason in Art: Volume Four of The Life of Reason (1905). New York: Dover Publications.
Saunders, F. S. (2000). The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the Worlds of Arts and Letters. New York: The New Press.
Seda, G., Manu L., & Teran, M., (2010). Trialogue on Interventions in Surveillance Space: Seda Gürses in conversation with Michelle Teran and Manu Luksch. In McGrath J., & Sweeny R. (Ed.), Surveillance & Society, Special Issue on Surveillance, Performance and New Media Art. Eds., vol.7, n°2, 171. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v7i2.4141
Shannon, Claude E., and Weaver, W., (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Champaign: University of Illinois Press, p. 19; quoted in Nunes, M. (2012). Error, Glitch, Noise and Jam in New Media Cultures. 1st ed. New York: Bloomsbury, 12.
Spies, W. (1982). Une poétique du collage. Paul Éluard et ses amis peintres, Exh. cat. 55. Paris: Centre Georges Pompidou; quoted in Chéroux, C. (2009). L’errore fotografico. Una breve storia. Turin: Einaudi, 85.
Virilio, P. in Lotringer S. and Virilio, P., (2005). The Accident of Art, Semiotext(e), Foreign Agents Series. Cambridge, Massachussets: MIT Press, p. 74; quoted in Roberts, J. (2011). The Necessity of Errors. London-New York: Verso, 250.
Wiener, N. (1998). The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society. New York: Da Capo, p. 108, 111; quoted in Nunes, M. (2012). Error, Glitch, Noise and Jam in New Media Cultures. 1st ed. New York: Bloomsbury, 12.