Main Article Content
This paper intends to examine two recent projects Enhancing the Mind’s I and Emerging Self that address notions of self-identity, the desire for freedom of form and the greater cognitive capacities promised by neuro-enhancement technologies. It is a bid on critical evaluation of the production of the artworks; departing from an understanding that the observer is not independent of reality and that observation and experience are constructed. Consciousness is considered as resulting from the organism capacities to understand its emotions and interacting context, thus the research explores the possibilities that memory and knowledge do not reflect a real exterior world, but a concrete interior world attempting to play with possibilities to generate affect and empathy in the audiences. The text reflects on the ethical side of Human Enhancement (i.e. the potentiation of biological characteristics of Human Body) and the technologies, such as Brain Computer Interaction (BCI) or digital tattoos (tattoos that have technological interactive properties), promising a refinement of nature by technology. It raises questions surrounding memory and identity through art installation. It explores whether is it possible to translate one’s emotions directly into matter, as a memory. The result is the opening of a critical gap between the way sciences produce knowledge about the subject and the affect produced by the experience of the viewer on the installation artworks.
Adler, Y. (2017). O Fascinante Mundo da Pele, Alfragide: Lua de Papel.
Ascott, R. (2000). Moistmedia, Technoetics and the Three VRs. Arts 3000. ISEA 2000 proceedings. http://www.isea-archives.org/docs/2000/proceedings/ISEA2000_proceedings.pdf (pp. 1-7).
Bandodkar, A. J. et. al. (2014). Tattoo-Based Noninvasive Glucose Monitoring: A Proof-of-Concept Study, Analytical Chemistry. American Chemical Society, https://doi.org/10.1021/ac504300n | Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 394−398.
Bitarello, B. Fuks, H.; Queiroz, J. (2011). New Technologies for Dynamic Tattoo Art. In: The Fifth International Conference On Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction. Funchal, Portugal: Acm, Isbn 978-1-4503-0478-8, https://doi.org/10.1145/1935701.1935774.
Bitarello, B., Queiróz, J. (2014). Embodied Semiotic Artefacts: On the Role of the Skin As A Semiotic Niche. Technoetic Arts: A Journal Of Speculative Research. Volume 12 Number 1. Intellect Ltd Article. English Language https://doi.org/10.1386/Tear.12.1.75_1.
Damásio, A. R. (2000). The Feeling Of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Dickson, J.; Oeggl, K.; Handley, L. (2003). A Saga Revivida De Ötzi, O Homem Do Gelo. Http://Www2.Uol.Com.Br/Sciam/Reportagens/A_Saga_Revivida_De_Otzi_O_Homem_Do_Gelo.Html.
Dreyfus, H. (1972). What Computers Can't Do. Cambridge, Ma: Mit Press. edition., Palgrave Schol, Print UK, Basingstoke; New York.
Foucault, M. (2003). The Birth of the Clinic: Archaeology of Medical Perception, Taylor and Francis e-Library.
Gallagher, S. (2005). How the Body Shapes The Mind. Oxford, Uk: Clarendon Press.
Garde-Hansen, J., Hoskins, A. & Reading, A. (2009). Save As... Digital Memories, Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Gilbert, S. (2005). Tattoo History. A Source Book. New York: Juno Books, 2000.
Harrison, S., Tatar, D. & Sengers, P. (2017). The Three Paradigms of HCI, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.96.3754&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
Hauser J. (2008). Who’s Afraid Of The In Between?. In Jens Hauser Ed. Sk-In Exhibition Catalog. Fact Liverpool.
Kao, H.-L., et.al. (2016). DuoSkin: Rapidly Prototyping On-Skin User Interfaces Using Skin-Friendly Materials. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. http://duoskin.media.mit.edu/duoskin_iswc16.pdf.
Latour, B. (1987). Science In Action: How To Follow Scientists And Engineers Through Society. Harvard University Press, USA.
Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s Hope: Essays On The Reality Of Science Studies. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press, USA.
Lopes, M. M. (2013). Representational Strategies On Alzheimer’s Disease: A Practice based Arts Research In A Neuroscience Laboratory (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation), University Of Brighton And University For The Creative Arts - Farnham, Uk.
Lopes, M. M. (2014) Art Making with Memory Matter: Mneno-Media, Creativity and Impairment from Human to Hyper-Human. CAC Computer Art and Design for all, EBA UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, pp. 85 – 96. 2005.
Lopes, M. M. (2015). Inside/Out: Looking Back into the Future, In Projective Processes and Neuroscience in Art and Design. Zuanon, Rachel (ed), Advances in Media, Entertainment, and the Arts (AMEA) Book Series, IGI Global, pp. 15 – 39. 2015.
Lopes M. M. (2016). Body Storytelling and the Performance of Memory: Arts-Based-Research and Human Enhancement. In: Streitz N., Markopoulos P. (eds) Distributed, Ambient and Pervasive Interactions. DAPI 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 9749. Springer, Cham. pp. 257–269, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39862-4_24.
Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis And Cognition. The Realization Of The Living. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Marzbani, H. et al (2016). Neurofeedback: A Comprehensive Review on System Design, Methodology and Clinical Applications. In Basic Clinical Neuroscience. 2016 Apr; 7(2): 143–158. https://doi.org/10.15412/J.BCN.03070208
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002). Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge.
Tao, X. (2005). Wearable Electronics And Photonics. Woodhead Publishing Limited In Association With The Textile Institute Abington Hall, Abington, Cambridge, England.
Van Dijck, J. 2007, Mediated Memories in the Digital Age, Stanford University Press.
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1993). The Embodied Mind. Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Mit Press: Cambridge.
Wania, C., Atwood, M., & McCain, K. (2007). Mapping the field of human-computer interaction (HCI). Proceedings of The American Society For Information Science and Technology, 43(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504301233