Digital Economy, Big Data and Competition Law
Main Article Content
Abstract
Big data has a very important role in the digital economy, because firms have accurate tools to collect, store, analyse, treat, monetise and disseminate voluminous amounts of data. Companies have been improving their revenues with information about the behaviour, preferences, needs, expectations, desires and evaluations of their consumers. In this sense, data could be considered as a productive input. The article focuses on the current discussion regarding the possible use of competition law and policy to address privacy concerns related to big data companies. The most traditional and powerful tool to deal with privacy concerns is personal data protection law. Notwithstanding, the article examines whether competition law should play an important role in data-driven markets where privacy is a key factor. The article suggests a new approach to the following antitrust concepts in cases related to big data platforms: assessment of market power, merger notification thresholds, measurement of merger effects on consumer privacy, and investigation of abuse of dominant position. In this context, the article analyses decisions of competition agencies which reviewed mergers in big data-driven markets, such as Google/DoubleClick, Facebook/ WhatsApp and Microsoft/LinkedIn. It also reviews investigations of alleged abuse of dominant position associated with big data, in particular the proceeding opened by the Bundeskartellamt against Facebook, in which the German antitrust authority prohibited the data processing policy imposed by Facebook on its users. The article concludes that it is important to harmonise the enforcement of competition, consumer and data protection polices in order to choose the proper way to protect the users of dominant platforms, maximising the benefits of the data-driven economy.
Downloads
References
Andreu, Javier, Carmen Poon, Robert D. Merrifield, Stephen Wong, and Guang-Zhong Yang. “Big data for health”. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 19, no. 4 (2015): 1193-1208. https://doi.org/10.1109/jbhi.2015.2450362
Armstrong, Mark. “Competition in two-sided markets”. RAND Journal of Economics 37, no. 3 (2006): 668-691.
Auer, Dirk. “The FCO’s Facebook Decision: Putting privacy before competition”. CPI EU News: FCO Facebook Quadriptych (March, 2019): 1-5. https://www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/cpi-eu-news-fco-facebook-quadriptych/#_edn4.
Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato. PS10601 CV154 – Sanzione da 3 Milioni di Euro per WhatsApp, Ha Indotto gli Utenti a Condividere i Loro Dati con Facebook. May 12, 2017. http://www.agcm.it/media/comunicati-stampa/2017/5/alias-8754.
Autorité de la Concurrence and Bundeskartellamt. Competition Law and Data (2016). https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Publikation/DE/Berichte/Big%20Data%20Papier.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2.
Averitt, Neil W. and Robert H. Lande. “Using the ‘consumer choice approach’ to antitrust law”. Antitrust Law Journal 74 (2007): 175-264.
Bourreau, Marc, Alexandre de Streel and Inge Graef. “Big data and competition policy: Market power, personalised pricing and advertising”. Centre on Regulation in Europe (February 16, 2017): 7-61. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2920301. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2920301
Boyd, Danah and Kate Crawford. “Six provocations for big data”. A Decade in Internet Time: Symposium on the Dynamics of the Internet and Society, September 21, 2011. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1926431 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1926431.
Bundeskartellamt. Background Information on the Facebook Proceeding, December 19, 2017, 1-6. https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Publikation/EN/Diskussions_Hintergrundpapiere/2017/Hintergrundpapier_Facebook.html.
Bundeskartellamt. Case Summary. B6-22/16. Facebook, Exploitative business terms pursuant to Section 19(1) GWB for inadequate data processing. 15 February 2019. https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Entscheidung/EN/Fallberichte/Missbrauchsaufsicht/2019/B6-22-16.html?nn=3600108.
Bundeskartellamt. Preliminary Assessment in Facebook Proceeding: Facebook’s Collection and Use of Data from Third-Party Sources is Abusive. December 19, 2017. https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Meldung/EN/Pressemitteilungen/2017/19_12_2017_Facebook.html.
Burkhardt, Beiten. “The new German competition law in a nutshell”. Lexology. June 26, 2017. https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=535d2bda-4598-413d-86c6-05b592b1c7b5.
Cavoukian, Ann. Privacy by Design in Law, Policy and Practice: A White Paper for Regulators, Decision-Makers and Policy-Makers, 2011. http://www.ontla.on.ca/library/repository/mon/25008/312239.pdf.
Colangelo, Giuseppe and Mariateresa Maggiolino. “Data accumulation and the privacyantitrust interface: Insights from the Facebook case for the EU and the U.S.”. TTLF Working Paper no. 31 (2018): 1-48. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3125490. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3125490
Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica. Guia para Análise de Atos de Concentração Horizontal, 2006. http://www.cade.gov.br/acesso-a-informacao/publicacoesinstitucionais/guias_do_Cade/guia-para-analise-de-atos-de-concentracao-horizontal. pdf/view.
Curry, Edward. “The big data value chain: Definitions, concepts, and theoretical approaches”. In New Horizons for a Data-Driven Economy, edited by José Maria Cavanillas, Edward Curry and Wolfgang Wahlster, 29-38. Switzerland: Springer, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21569-3_3
De Mauro, Andrea, Mauro Greco and Micheli Grimaldi. “What is big data? A consensual definition and a review of a key research topics”. 4th International Conference on Integrated Information (2014): 1-11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265775800_What_is_Big_Data_A_Consensual_Definition_and_a_Review_of_Key_Research_Topics.
Eilmansberger, Thomas. “How to distinguish good from bad competition under article 82 EC: In search of clearer and more coherent standards for anti-competitive abuses”. Common Market Law Review 42 (2005): 129-177.
European Commission. Case M.7217. Facebook/WhatsApp. October 3, 2014 http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/decisions/m7217_20141003_20310_3962132_EN.pdf.
European Commission. Case M.8124. Microsoft/LinkedIn. December 6, 2016. http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/decisions/m8124_1349_5.pdf.
European Commission. Fact Sheet Data cPPP. https://ec.europa.eu/research/industrial_technologies/pdf/factsheet-cppp_en.pdf.
European Commission. Guidance on the Commission’s Enforcement Priorities in Applying Art. 82 of the EC Treaty to Abusive Exclusionary Conduct by Dominant Undertakings (2009/C 45/02). February 24, 2009. http://ec.europa.eu/competition/antitrust/art82/.
European Commission. Guidelines on the Assessment of Horizontal Mergers under the Council Regulation on the Control of Concentrations between Undertakings (2004/C31/03). February 2, 2004. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52004XC0205%2802%29.
European Commission. The EU Data Protection Reform and Big Data. March 2016. https://ec.europa.eu/epsc/publications/strategic-notes/enter-data-economy_en.
European Commission. Towards a Thriving Data-Driven Economy, COM (2014) 442, July 2, 2014, 4. https://ec.europa.eu/digitalagenda/en/news/communication-data-driven-economy.
Evans, David S. “Attention to rivalry among online platforms and its implications for antitrust analysis”. Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Working Paper no. 627, (2013): 1-42. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/law_and_economics/68/.
Evans, David S. “Some empirical aspects of multi-sided platform industries”. Review of Network Economics 2, no. 3 (2003): 191-209.
Evans, David S. “The online advertising industry: Economics, evolution, and privacy”. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 23, no. 3 (2009): 37-60. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.23.3.37
Federal Trade Commission. Revised Jurisdictional Thresholds for Section 7A of the Clayton Act. January 29, 2018. https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/federal_register_notices/2018/01/revised_jurisdiction_7a_1-29-18.pdf.
Filistrucchi, Lapo, Damien Geradin, and Eric Van Damme. “Identifying two-sided markets”. TILEC Discussion Paper no. 2012-008 (2012): 1-25. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2008661. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2008661
Forgioni, Paula. Os Fundamentos do Antitruste. São Paulo: Revista dos Tribunais, 2018.
Frazão, Ana. “Big data e impactos sobre a análise concorrencial: Preocupações que já se vislumbram no cenário atual”. Jota, February 7, 2018. https://www.jota.info/?pagename=paywall&redirect_to=//www.jota.info/opiniao-e-analise/colunas/constituicao-empresa-e-mercado/big-data-e-impactos-sobre-analise-concorrencial-2-07022018.
Giannino, Michele. Microsoft/LinkedIn: What the European Commission Said on the Competition Review of Digital Market Mergers (2017): 1-17. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3005299. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3005299
Grunes, Allen P. and Maurice E. Stucke. “No mistake about it: The important role of antitrust in the era of big data”. University of Tennessee Legal Studies Research Paper no. 269 (2015). https://ssrn.com/abstract=2600051.
Harbour, Pamela Jones and Tara Isa Koslov. “Section 2 in a Web 2.0 World: An expanded vision of relevant product markets”, Antitrust Law Journal 76 (2010): 769-797.
Hazen, Benjamin T., Christopher A. Boone, Jeremy D. Ezell and L. Allison Jones-Farmer. “Data quality for data science, predictive analytics, and big data in supply chain management: An introduction to the problem and suggestions for research and applications”. International Journal of Productions Economics 154 (2014): 72-80. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527314001339?via%3Dihub. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.04.018
Hilbert, Martin and Priscila López. “The world’s technological capacity to store, communicate, and compute information”. Science 332, no. 6025 (2011): 60-65. http://science.sciencemag.org/content/332/6025/60.full. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1200970
Khan, Lina. “Amazon’s antitrust paradox”. Yale Law Journal 126, no. 3 (2016-2017): 712-805. https://www.yalelawjournal.org/pdf/e.710.Khan.805_zuvfyyeh.pdf.
Martens, Bertin. “An economic policy perspective on online platforms”. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies Digital Economy Working Paper 2016/05 (2016): 1-60. https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/sites/jrcsh/files/JRC101501.pdf.
McAfee, Andrew and Erik Brynjolfsson. “Big data: The management revolution”. Harvard Business Review 90, no. 10 (2012): 60-68.
Miller, H. Gilbert and Peter Mork. “From data to decisions: A value chain for big data”. IT Professional 15, no. 1 (2013): 57-59. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260305818_From_Data_to_Decisions_A_Value_Chain_for_Big_Data. https://doi.org/10.1109/mitp.2013.11
Modrall, Jay. “Big data and merger control in the EU”. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 9, no. 9 (2018): 569-578. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpy062
Morando, Federico, Raimondo Iemma, and Emilio Raiteri. “Privacy evaluation: What empirical research on users’ valuation of personal data tells us”. Internet Policy Review 3, no. 2 (2014). https://policyreview.info/articles/analysis/privacy-evaluation-what-empirical-research-users-valuation-personal-data-tells-us.
Nazzini, Renato. “Privacy and Antitrust: Searching for the (hopefully not yet lost) soul of competition law in the EU after the German Facebook Decision”. CPI EU News: FCO Facebook Quadriptych (March, 2019): 1-8. https://www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/cpi-eu-news-fco-facebook-quadriptych/#_edn4.
Newman, John M. “Antitrust in zero-price markets: Foundations”. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 164, no. 1 (2015): 149-206.
OECD. Algorithms and Collusion: Competition Policy in the Digital Age, 2017. www.oecd.org/competition/algorithms-collusion-competition-policy-in-the-digital-age.htm.
OECD. Data-Driven Innovation for Growth and Well-Being Interim Synthesis Report, 2017. http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/data-driven-innovation-interim-synthesis.pdf.
Office of Fair Trade. Assessment of Market Power. December 1st, 2004. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/284400/oft415.pdf.
Office of Fair Trade. Completed Acquisition by Motorola Mobility Holding (Google, Inc.) of Waze Mobile Limited. ME/6167/13. November 11, 2013. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/555de2cfed915d7ae2000027/motorola.pdf.
Ohlhausen, Maureen K., and Alexander P. Okuliar. “Competition, consumer protection and the right (approach) to privacy”. Antitrust Law Journal 80, no. 1 (2015): 121-156.
Petit, Nicolas. “From formalism to effects? The Commission’s communication on enforcement priorities in applying Article 82 EC”. World Competition: Law and Economics Review, forthcoming (2009): 1-19. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1476082. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1476082
Pittman, Russell W. “Consumer surplus as the appropriate standard for antitrust enforcement”. Competition Policy International 3, no. 2 (2007): 205-224. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1075463.
Rubinfeld, Daniel L. and Michal S. Gal. “The hidden costs of free goods: Implications for antitrust enforcement”. Antitrust Law Journal 80 (2016): 521-562.
Rust, Roland T., Kannan P. K., and N. Peng. “The customer economics of internet privacy”. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 30 (2002): 455-464. https://doi.org/10.1177/009207002236917
Savage, Scott J. and Donald M. Waldman. “Privacy tradeoffs in smartphone applications”. Economic Letters 137 (2015): 171-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2015.10.016
Schneider, Giulia. “Testing art. 102 TFEU in the digital marketplace: Insights from the Bundeskartellamt’s investigation against Facebook”. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 9, no. 4 (2018): 213-225. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeclap/lpy016.
Schweitzer, Heike, Justus Haucap, Wolfgang Kerber, and Robert Welker. Modernising the Law on Abuse of Market Power: Report for the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy. September 17, 2018. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3250742. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3250742
Shelanski, Howard A. “Information, innovation, and competition policy for the internet”. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 161 (2013): 1663-1678.
Sokol, D. Daniel and Roisin E. Comerford. “Antitrust and regulating big data”. George Mason Law Review 23, no. 5 (2016): 1129-1162.
Stucke, Maurice E. and Allen P. Grunes. Big Data and Competition Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
Stucke, Maurice E. and Ariel Ezrachi. “Looking up in the data-driven economy”. University of Tennessee Legal Studies Research Paper 333 (2017): 1-6. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2975510. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2975510
Tirole, Jean. Economics for the Common Goods. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017.
Tucker, Catherine. “The implications of improved attribution and measurability for antitrust and privacy in online advertising markets”. George Mason Law Review 20, no. 4 (2013): 1025-1034.
Tucker, Darren S. and Hill Wellford. “Big mistakes regarding big data”. The Antitrust Source (December 2014): 1-12. https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publishing/antitrust_source/dec14_tucker_12_16f.authcheckdam.pdf.
Vezzoso, Simonetta. “Competition policy in a world of big data”. In Research Handbook on Digital Transformations, edited by F. Xavier Olleros and Majlinda Zhegu, 400-420. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2016. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2717497.
Wu, Tim. “Blind spot: The attention economy and the law”. Antitrust Law Journal, forthcoming (2017): 2-40, https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/2029.
Wu, Tim. “It’s time to break up Facebook”. The Verge. April 9th, 2018. https://www.theverge.com/2018/9/4/17816572/tim-wu-facebook-regulation-interview-curse-of-bigness-antitruste.
Wu, Tim. The Attention Merchants: The Epic Scramble to Get Inside Our Heads. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2016.