The Boundaries of EU Copyright Law: Cheese, Jeans and a Military Report in the Court of Justice
Main Article Content
Abstract
Copyright is a centrepiece in the ongoing construction of the digital single market. Evidently, copyright only applies to works. Thus, the definition of its scope lies in knowing what a work is. Although that was not envisioned nor intended by the lawmaker, the Court of Justice has adopted a European notion of work in its controversial decision C-5/08, Infopaq, conflating it with the one of originality. Such an approach has been confirmed and expanded by subsequent case law. The Court has already fleshed out the main criterion for a creation to enjoy copyright – it must be original in the sense of being the author’s own creation – and seems to reject any additional criteria. However, the boundaries of the European notion of work are still unknown. Some recent preliminary ruling requests will allow some clarification. One asks about the possibility of copyright protection for the taste of a specific cheese (C-310/17, Levola Hengelo). Another one deals with the protection of a fashion design for jeans (C-683/17, Cofemel) and yet another concerns a military report (C-469/17, Funke Medien). After describing the evolution of the law on the EU notion of copyright, this article frames and critically analyses the questions surrounding these cases, proposes answers thereto and makes a prediction of the outcome, i.e. the Court’s decision, in each of them.
Downloads
References
Aplin, Tanya. “Subject matter”. In Research Handbook on the Future of EU Copyright, edited by Estelle Derclaye, 49-76. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2009.
Bently, Lionel, Brad Sherman, Dev Gangjee, and Phillip Johnson. Intellectual Property Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
Bently, Lionel. “The return of industrial copyright?”. European Intellectual Property Review 34, (2012): 654-672.
Buccafusco, Christopher. “On the legal consequences of sauces: Should Thomas Keller’s recipes be per se copyrightable?”. Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (2007): 1121-1156.
Calleja, Leon. “Why copyright law lacks taste and scents”. Journal of Intelelctual Property Law (2013): 1-31.
Casas Vallés, Ramón. “The requirement of originality”. In Research Handbook on the Future of EU Copyright, edited by Estelle Derclaye, 102-132. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2009.
Derclaye, Estelle. “Infopaq International A/S v. Danske Dagblades Forening (C-5/08): wonderful or worrisome? The impact of the ECJ ruling in Infopaq on UK copyright law”. European Intellectual Property Review 32 (2010): 247-251.
Derclaye, Estelle. “The copyright/design interface in Italy”. In The Copyright/Design Interface: Past, Present and Future, edited by Estelle Derclaye, 269-296. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108182676.010
Derclaye, Estelle. “The Court of Justice copyright case law: Quo vadis?”. European Intellectual Property Review 36 (2014): 716-723.
Fabbio, Philipp. Disegni e Modelli. Padova: CEDAM, 2012.
Favale, Marcella, Martin Kretschmer and Paul C. Torremans. “Is there a EU copyright jurisprudence? – An empirical analysis of the workings of the European Court of Justice”. The Modern Law Review (2016): 31-75. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12166
Fröhlich, Stefan. Düfte als Geistiges Eigentum. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2008.
Gaubiac, Yves. “La théorie de l’unité de l’art”. Revue Internationale du Droit d’Auteur 111 (1982): 3-71.
Gendreau, Ysolde (ed.). Copyright and Photographs: An International Survey. London: Kluwer Law International, 1999.
Gervais, Daniel. “Feist goes global: A comparative analysis of the notion of originality in copyright law”. Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A. 49 (2002): 949-981.
Griffiths, Johnathan. “Dematerialization, pragmatism and the European copyright revolution”. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 33(4) (2013): 769-790. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqt017
Guillemin, Claire. Law et Odeur: Fragrance Protection in the Fields of Perfumery and Cosmetics. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2016.
Heinze, Christian. “Software als Schutzgegenstand des Europäischen Urheberrechts”. Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law 2(1) (2011): 97-113.
Jehoram, Herman Cohen. “Cumulation of protection in the EC design proposals”. European Intellectual Property Review 16 (1994): 514-520.
Jotzo, Florian. “Der EuGH als Interimsnormgeber im digitalen Urheberrecht”. Zeitschrift für Geistiges Eigentum 9(4) (2017): 447-470. https://doi.org/10.1628/186723717x15097154394172
Leistner, Matthias. “Copyright at the interface between EU law and national law: Definition of ‘work’ and ‘right of communication to the public’”. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2015): 626-637. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpv086
Lucas, André, Henri-Jacques Lucas, and Agnès Lucas-Schlötter. Traité de la Propriété Littéraire et Artistique (Paris: Lexis-Nexis, 2012)
Margoni, Thomas. “The harmonisation of EU copyright law: The originality standard”. In Global Governance of Intellectual Property in the 21st Century: Reflecting Policy through Change, edited by Mark Perry, Mark, 85-105. Cham: Springer, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31177-7_6
Nordemann, Wilhelm, and Friedrich Karl Fromm. Urheberrecht: Kommentar zum Urheberrechtsgesetz und zum Urheberrechtswahrnehmungsgesetz. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 2008.
Ohly, Ansgar. “The case for partial cumulation in Germany”. In The Copyright/Design Interface: Past, Present and Future, edited by Estelle Derclaye, 128-170. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108182676.007
Pila, Justine. “Copyright and its categories of original works”. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30 (2010): 229-254. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqq009
Pila, Justine, and Paul Torremans. European Intellectual Property Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
Quaedvlieg, Antoon. “Copyright and perfume: Nose, intellect and industry”. Revue Internationale du Droit d’Auteur 230 (2011): 7-77.
Quaedvlieg, Antoon. “The copyright/design interface in the Netherlands”. In The Copyright/Design Interface: Past, Present and Future, edited by Estelle Derclaye, 36-79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108182676.004
Rahmatian, Andreas. “European copyright inside or outside the European Union: Pluralism of copyright laws and the ‘Herderian Paradox’”. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 47 (2016): 912-940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-016-0531-4
Rahmatian, Andreas. “Originality in UK copyright law: The old ‘skill and labour’ doctrine under pressure”. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 44 (2013): 4-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-012-0003-4
Ricketson, Sam and Uma Suthersanen. “The design/ copyright overlap: Is there a resolution?”. In Overlapping Intellectual Property Rights, edited by Neil J. Wilkof and Shamnad Basheer, 159-187. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Rosati, Eleonora. Originality in EU Copyright: Full Harmonization through Case Law. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2013.
Schulze, Gernot. “Schleichende Harmonisierung des urheberrechtlichen Werkbegriffs? – Anmerkung zu EuGH Infopaq/DDF”. Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht (2009): 1019-102.
Seville, Catherine. “Copyright in perfumes: Smelling a rat”. Cambridge Law Journal (2007): 49-52. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008197307000372
Sousa e Silva, Nuno. “No copyright protection for tap designs – says Portuguese Court”. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2013): 686-687. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpt111
Sousa e Silva, Nuno. “Novelty is not enough: Spanish Supreme Court rejects unity of the art in an enigmatic decision”. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2013): 825-826. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpt179
Sousa e Silva, Nuno. The Ownership Problems of Overlaps in European Intellectual Property. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2014.
Sousa e Silva, Pedro. A Protecção Jurídica do Design. Coimbra: Almedina 2017. Strowel, Alain. Droit d’Auteur et Copyright, Divergences et Convergences: Étude de Droit Comparé. Bruxelles: E. Bruylant, 1994.
Ulmer, Eugen. Urheber- und Verlagsrecht. Berlin: Springer, 1980.
Van Eechoud, Mireille. “Along the road to uniformity – Diverse readings of the Court of Justice judgments on copyright work”. Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and E-Commerce Law 3(1) (2012): 60-80.
Van Gompel, Stef and Erlend Lavik. “Quality, merit, aesthetics and purpose: An inquiry into EU copyright law’s eschewal of other criteria than originality”. Revue Internationale du Droit d’Auteur 236 (2013): 100-295.