The Impact of EURODAC in EU Migration Law: The Era of Crimmigration?

Main Article Content

Benedita Menezes Queiroz
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0549-564X

Abstract

Counter-terrorism and public security measures have significantly altered EU immigration law. Under the premise that EU instruments which regulate EU immigration databases influence the legal regime of irregularity of migrants’ statuses, the present article argues that the latest developments in the area of data technology contribute to the phenomenon of “crimmigration”. This is so not only because they may generate a sort of “digital illegality” due to their impact on the categorisation of migrants, but also because they enable a conflation of treatment of irregularity, asylum seeking and criminality. This article focuses on the recent amendments and proposals for amendments to the EURODAC Regulation, a database that regulates the asylum fingerprint system in the EU. This is revealing of the ongoing broadening of the purpose of that data and law enforcement access to the collected information. The argument finds its basis in three main trends common to these databases: the erosion of the principle of purpose limitation, the widening of access to data by law enforcement authorities, and the digitalisation of borders through biometrics. Ultimately, this article claims that the level of surveillance of certain categories of migrants that may cross the borders of the EU puts at risk the distinction between illegally staying irregular migrants and criminals, given that the treatment of their personal data is insufficiently clear in practice.

Keywords: EURODAC, Asylum seekers, Illegally staying third-country nationals, Immigration databases, Crimmigration, Surveillance, Digital borders

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abelson, Hal, Ken Ledeen and Harry R. Lewis. Blown to Bits: Your Life, Liberty, and Happiness after the Digital Explosion. Boston: Addison-Wesley Professional, 2008.

Amoore, Louise. “Biometric borders: Governing mobilities in the war on terror”. Political Geography 25 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.02.001

Baldaccini, Anneliese. “Counter-terrorism and the EU strategy for border security: Framing suspects with biometric documents and databases”. European Journal of Migration and Law 10 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1163/138836407x261308

Barbou des Places, Ségolène. “Evolution of asylum legislation in the EU: Insights from regulatory competition theory”. RSCAS Working Paper 16 (2003).

Besters, Michiel and Frans WA Brom. “Greedy information technology: The digitalization of the European migration policy”. European Journal of Migration and Law 12 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1163/157181610x535782

Betts, Alexander and Paul Collier. Refuge – Transforming a Broken Refugee System. London: Penguin Books, 2017.

Boehm, Franziska. Information Sharing and Data Protection in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22392-1

Broeders, Dennis. “A European ‘border’ surveillance system under construction. In Migration and the New Technological Borders of Europe. Migration, Minorities and Citizenship, edited by Huub Dijstelbloem and Albert Meijer. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299382_3

Broeders, Dennis. Breaking Down Anonymity: Digital Surveillance on Irregular Migrants in Germany and the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2009. https://doi.org/10.5117/9789089641595

Brouwer, Evelien Renate. Digital Borders and Real Rights: Effective Remedies for Third- Country Nationals in the Schengen Information System, vol 15. Leiden: Brill, 2008. ttps://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004165038.i-568

Brouwer, Evelien Renate. “Eurodac: Its limitations and temptations”. European Journal of Migration and Law 4 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1163/157181602400287378

Brouwer, Evelien Renate. “Legality and data protection law: The forgotten purpose of purpose limitation”. In The Eclipse of the Legality Principle in the European Union, edited by Leonard F. M. Besselink, Frans Pennings and Sacha Prechal. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2011.

Dijstelbloem, Huub. “Europe’s new technological gatekeeper. Debating the deployment of technology in migration policy”, Amsterdam Law Forum 1 (2009) (http://amsterdamlawforum.org/article/view/90/154).

Dijstelbloem, Huub and Albert Meijer. “Reclaiming control over Europe’s technological borders”. In Migration and the New Technological Borders of Europe, edited by Huub Dijstelbloem and Albert Meijer. London: Palgrave MacMillan, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299382_7

Dumas, Perrine. L’Accès des Ressortissants des Pays Tiers au Territoire des États Membres de l’Union Européenne. Brussels: Bruylant, 2013.

Ferraris, Valeria. “Economic migrants and asylum seekers in ten fingers: Some reflections on Eurodac and border control”, 2017, https://www.law.ox.ac.uk/researchsubject-groups/centre-criminology/centreborder-criminologies/blog/2017/05/economic-migrants.

Franko Aas, Katja. “Crimmigrant bodies and bona fide travelers: Surveillance, citizenship and global governance”. Theoretical Criminology, 15(3) (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480610396643

Franko Aas, Katja. “‘The body does not lie’: Identity, risk and trust in technoculture”, Crime, Media, Culture 2 (2006): 143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741659006065401

Leun, Joanne van der, and Maartje van der Woude. “A reflection on crimmigration in the Netherlands”. In Social Control and Justice – Crimmigration in the Age of Fear, edited by Maria João Guia, Maartje van der Woude and Joanne van der Leun. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing, 2013.

Liu, Yue. “Scenario study of biometric systems at borders”. Computer Law & Security Review 27 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2010.11.006

Mitsilegas, Valsamis. “Immigration control in an era of globalization: Deflecting foreigners, weakening citizens, strengthening the State”. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 19 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2979/indjglolegstu.19.1.3

Mitsilegas, Valsamis. “The borders paradox: The surveillance of movement in a Union without internal frontiers”. In A Right to Inclusion and Exclusion? Normative Faultlines of the EU’s Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, edited by Hans Lindahl. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2009.

Mitsilegas, Valsamis. The Criminalisation of Migration in Europe. Springer, 2015.

Peers, Steve, Elspeth Guild and Jonathan Tomkin. EU Immigration and Asylum Law. Brill, 2012.

Rijpma, Jorrit. “Building borders: The regulatory framework for the management of the external borders of the European Union”. PhD dissertation. Florence: European University Institute, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/12989

Roots, Lehte. “The new EURODAC regulation: Fingerprints as a source of Informal discrimination”. Baltic Journal of European Studies Tallinn University of Technology 5, no. 2 (2015).

Stumpf, Juliet. “The crimmigration crisis: Immigrants, crime, & sovereign power”. American University Law Review 56 (2006).

Tzanou, Maria. “The added value of data protection as a fundamental right in the EU legal order in the context of law enforcement”. PhD dissertation. Florence: European University Institute, 2012. ttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/22697