Private Enforcement and Market Regulation

Main Article Content

Sara Landini
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7572-8707

Abstract

The article examines the technique of private enforcement as a juridical instrument to protect the market in combination with the punitive sanction mechanisms of public law. After a first definition of private enforcement, we investigate the position taken by the European Commission on the use of private enforcement, verifying its function with respect to the objectives of market protection. The main instruments of private enforcement are therefore considered: civil liability, termination of the contract, nullity of the contract, injunction. We will focus on the main constraints to the application of the abovementioned instruments of private enforcement proposing solutions in the light of an overcoming of the boundaries between public law and private law. As highlighted in Directive 2014/104/EU, “the practical effect of the prohibitions laid down requires that anyone – be they an individual, including consumers and undertakings, or a public authority – can claim compensation before national courts for the harm caused to them by an infringement of those provisions.” For this reason it is important to consider all the different private enforcement tools and try to remove the obstacles to their effective functioning. Private law is activated on the action of individuals who exercise the rights recognised by the law. Individuals being closer to the emergence of the problem are able to represent the violation of the interests at stake according to the logic proper to the principle of subsidiarity. The Principle of subsidiarity states that a wider and greater body, such as a government, should not exercise functions that can be carried out efficiently by a smaller one, such as an individual or a private group, acting independently.

Keywords: Market regulation, Private enforcement, EU Law

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abram, Nils. “Schützt das neue Recht den Versicherungsnehmer gegen Folgen einer Pflichtverletzung seines Versicherungsvermittlers?”. VersicherungsRecht 30 (2008): 724-730.

Amadio, Giuseppe. “Nullità del contratto e conformazione del contratto (note minime in tema di ‘abuso dell’autonomia contrattuale’)”. Rivista di Diritto Civile 10 (2005): 299-303.

Becker, Gary S. “Crime and punishment: An economic approach”. The Journal of Political Economy 76, no. 32 (1968): 169-217. https://doi.org/10.1086/259394

Binding, Karl. Die Normen und ihre Übertretung, vol. I, Normen und Strafgesetze, 4th ed. Leipzig: Meyner, 1922.

Bloom, Margaret. “Despite its great success, the EC leniency program faces great challenges”. In European Competition Law Annual 2006: Enforcement of Prohibition of Cartels, edited by Claus-Dieter Ehlermann and Isabela Atanasiu, 543-556. Oxford/Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2007. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472560148.ch-022

Calviño, Nadia. “Public enforcement in the EU: Deterrent effect and proportionality of fines”. In European Competition Law Annual 2006: Enforcement of Prohibition of Cartels, edited by Claus-Dieter Ehlermann and Isabela Atanasiu, 317-345. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472560148.ch-013

Cohen, Dorothy. “Remedies for consumer protection: Prevention, restitution or punishment”. Journal of Marketing 39, no. 4 (1975): 24-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297503900404

Dekeyser, Kriss. “Impact of public enforcement on antitrust damages actions: Some likely effects of settlements and commitments on private actions for damages”. In European Competition Law Annual 2008: Antitrust Settlements under EC Competition Law, edited by C. D. Ehlermann and M. Marquis, 157-213. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008.

Denozza, Francesco and Luca Toffoletti. “Le funzioni delle azioni private nel libro bianco sul risarcimento del danno antitrust: Compensazione, deterrenza e coordinamento con l’azione pubblica”. In Il Private Enforcement delle Norme sulla Concorrenza, edited by F. Rossi dal Pozzo and B. Nascimbene, 101-122. Milano: Giuffré, 2009.

Febbrajo, Tommaso. “Good faith and pre-contractual liability in Italy: Recent developments in the interpretation of article 1337 of the Italian Civil Code”, Italian Law Journal 2, no. 2 (2016): 291-312.

Gaul, Rudolf. “Zum Abschluss des Versicherungsvertrags – Alternativen zum Antragsmodell?” . VersicherungsRecht 29 (2007): 21-26.

Gelauff, George, Isabel Grilo, and Arjan Lejour. Subsidiarity and Economic Reform in Europe. Springer, 2008.

Grossi, Paolo. “Il diritto civile nella legalità costituzionale”. Rassegna di Diritto Civile 3 (2009): 914 - 924.

Hess, Burkhard. “‘Private law enforcement’ und Kollektivklagen”. Juristenzeitung 66, no. 2 (2011): 66-76. https://doi.org/10.1628/002268811794357601

Howells, Geraint, Hans-W. Micklitz, and Thomas Wilhelmsson. European Fair Trading Law. The Unfair Commercial Practices Directive. Farnham: Ashgate, 2006.

Jacobs, Franchis G. and Thomas Deisenhofer. “Procedural aspects of the effective private enforcement of EC competition rules: A community perspective”. In European Competition Law Annual 2001: Effective Private Enforcement of EC Antitrust Law, edited by Claus-Dieter Ehlermann and Isabela Atanasiu, 185-226. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2003.

Joshua, Julian. “The European cartel enforcement regime postmodernization: How is it working?”. George Mason Law Review 13, no. 6 (2006): 1247-1271.

Komninos, Assimakis. “The relationship between public and private enforcement: Quod dei deo, quod caesaris caesari”. June 23, 2011. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1870723 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1870723.

Landini, Sara. “Intese anticoncorrenziali nel settore assicurativo e risarcimento del danno a favore degli assicurati”. In La Disciplina della Concorrenza in Ambito Assicurativo, edited by Marco Frigessi di Rattalma, 37-47. Tourin: Giappichelli, 2014.

Lorenz, Egon. Der Schutz vor dem unerwünschten Vertrag. Eine Untersuchung von Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Abschlußkontrolle im geltenden Recht. München: Beck, 1997.

MacIntyre, Everette. “Antitrust injunctions: a flexible private remedy”, Duke Law Journal 15, no. 1 (1966): 22-40. https://doi.org/10.2307/1371394

Meli, Vincenzo. “I rimedi per la violazione del divieto di pubblicità ingannevole”. Rivista di Diritto Industriale 49, no. 1 (2000): 17-48.

Navarretta, Emanuela. “Buona fede oggettiva, contratti di impresa e diritto europeo”. Rivista di Diritto Civile 51, no. 5 (2005): 507-585.

Pasquino, Teresa. “Obblighi di informazione e rimedi contrattuali nella fornitura dei servizi telematici”, Studium Juris (2005): 860-876.

Pennasilico, Mauro. Metodo e Valori nell’Interpretazione dei Contratti. Per un’Ermeneutica Contrattuale Rinnovata. Napoli: Esi, 2011.

Perlingieri, Pietro. “Applicazione e controllo nell’interpretazione giuridica”. Rivista di Diritto Civile 1 (2010): 317-332.

Perlingieri, Pietro. “Fonti del diritto e ‘ordinamento del caso concreto’”. Rivista di Diritto Privato 4 (2010): 7-35.

Perlingieri, Pietro. “L’interpretazione della legge come sistematica ed assiologica. Il broccardo in claris non fit interpretatio, il ruolo dell’art. 12 disp. prel. c.c. e la nuova scuola dell’esegesi”. Rassegna di Diritto Civile 4 (1985): 990-1003.

Präve, Peter. “Die VVG-Informationspflichtenverordnung”. VersischerungsRecht 30 (2008): 151-157.

Putti, Pietro Maria. “L’invalidità dei contratti”. In Trattato diritto privato europeo, vol. III, L’attività e il contratto, 603-739. Padova: Cedam, 2003.

Rattalma, Marco Frigessi di. “Uniformità del diritto della concorrenza e della tutela del consumatore in Europa: mito o realtà?”. In Nuove Sfide in Tema di Concorrenza e Aiuti di Stato nell’Unione Europea: Problemi Sostanziali e Equo Processo, edited by Marco Frigessi di Rattalma and Patricia de Cesari, 36-42. Napoli: Editoriale Scientifica, 2013.

Ray, Jonathan H. and Andrei Shleifer. “Private enforcement of public laws: A theory of legal reform”. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 88, no. 2 (1998): 398-403.

Reiff, Peter. “Das Gesetz zur Neuregelung des Versicherungsvermittlerrechts”. VersicherungsRecht 29 (2007): 722-768.

Römmer, Wolfgang. “Zu den Informationspflichten nach dem neue VVG”. VersicherungsRecht 29 (2007): 618-627.

Schmolke, Klaus U. “Private enforcement und institutionelle Balance – Verlangt das Effektivitätsgebot des Art. 4 III EUV eine Schadensersatzhaftung bei Verstoß gegen Art. 15 MAR?”. Neue Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht [NZG] 19 (2016): 721-728.

Scoditti, Enrico. “Regole di comportamento e regole di validità: I nuovi sviluppi della responsabilità precontrattuale”. Danno e Responsabilità (2006).

Scoditti, Enrico. “Regole di validità e principio di correttezza nei contratti del consumatore”. Rivista di Diritto Civile 52, no. 1 (2006): 119-143.

Stigler, George. “The optimum enforcement of laws”. The Journal of Political Economy, 78, no. 36 (1970): 526-536. https://doi.org/10.1086/259646

Stockmeier, Hermann. “Das Vertragsabschlussverfahren nach neuem VVG”. Versicherungs Recht 30 (2008): 717-730.

Waelbroeck, Denis and Donald Slater. “The Commission’s Green Paper on Private Enforcement: ‘Americanization’ of EC competition law enforcement?”. In European Competition Law Annual 2006: Enforcement of Prohibition of Cartels, edited by C. Ehlermann and I. Atanasiu, 425-445. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007.

Weatherill, Stephen and Ulf Bernitz. The Regulation of Unfair Commercial Practices under EC Directive 2005/29/CE. New Rules and New Techniques. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007.

Weiler, Frank. Die beeinflußte Willenserklärung. Disertation Universitaet von Bielefeld, 2002.

Weinreb, Lloyd L. Legal Reasoning. The Use of Analogy in Legal Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

Werber, Manfred. “Information und Beratung des Versicherungsnehmers von und nach Abschluss des Versicherungsvertrags”. VersicherungsRecht 29 (2007): 1153-1159.

Wils, Wouter P. “Private enforcement of EU antitrust law and its relationship with public enforcement: Past, present and future, world competition”. Law and Economics Review 40, no. 1 (2016): 3-46.