The Bajratari case: are all resources good enough for EU law?
Main Article Content
Abstract
The Bajratari case is a significant contribution of the Court of Justice of the European Union to the clarification of the meaning of the condition of sufficient resources within the regime of the Citizens Directive 2004/38 (Article 7 (1) (b)). Moreover, it is also a step towards strengthening EU citizen’s right to move and reside in another Member State. In this decision the Court held that income that results from the exercise of professional activities without a lawful residence and employment permit is not to be excluded from the condition of sufficient resources imposed by EU law to a Union citizen who is residing for more than three months in another Member State.
Downloads
References
Dashwood, Alan, Michal Dougan, Barry J. Rodger, Eleanor Spaventa, and Derrick Wyatt. Wyatt and Dashwood’s European Union Law. Hart Publishing, 2011.
Guild, Elspeth, Steve Peers, and Jonathan Tomkin. The EU Citizenship Directive: A Commentary. Oxford University Press, 2014.
Herwig, Verschueren. “Free movement or benefit tourism: The unreasonable burden of Brey”. European Journal of Migration and Law 16, no. 2 (2014): 147-179.
Menezes Queiroz, Benedita, Illegally Staying in the EU – An Analysis of Illegality in EU Migration Law. Hart Publishing, 2018.
Neuvonen, Päivi Johanna. “EU citizenship and its ‘very specific’ essence: Rendón Marin and CS”. Common Market Law Review 54, Issue 4 (2017): 1201-1220.
Shuibhne, Niamh Nic. “Derrogating from the free movement of persons: When can EU citizens be deported?”. CYELS 8 (2016): 187-227.
Stumpf, Juliet. “Doing time: Crimmigration law and the perils of haste”, UCLA Law Review 58 (2011): 1705.
Stumpf, Juliet. “The crimmigration crisis: Immigrants, crime, & sovereign power”. Bepress Legal Series, Working Paper.