Governmentality and the Arts That Matter: Producing the Conformed, Flexible and Creative Pupil Since the Turn of the 20th Century

Main Article Content

Wiktoria Szawiel
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7449-892X
Jorge Ramos do Ó
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1013-9244
Tomás Vallera
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4636-0015

Abstract

This article seeks to describe the historical derivations, continuities and displacements that have led to the widely consensual contemporary narratives, adopted by governmental entities and international policymakers, concerning the benefits of the arts to education and the constitution of personal identity. A history of the present approach is used to unveil the strategic purposes of a biopower, which, at its very origin, had efficiently correlated the promotion and inculcation of artistic values with the normalization of infant and child populations. To this end, we propose an analysis of two historical moments – at the turn of the 20th century and the beginning of the 21st century – in which aesthetic experiences, practices of the self and governmental rationalities were articulated in order to produce specific kinds of social actors and manage their fates.

Keywords: Governmentality, History of arts education, Technologies of the self, Pupil as artist, Educational policies

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, J., & Owens, A. (2016). Theories of creativity and democratic education: Practices and politics of learning through the arts. Routledge.

Baldacchino, J. (2008). The Praxis of Art’s Deschooled Practice. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 27, 241-250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2008.00580.x

Baldacchino, J. (2014). Art’s False “Ease”: Form, Meaning and a Problematic Pedagogy. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 33(4), 433–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-013-9396-x

Bauman, Z. (2008). The Art of Life. Polity.

Böhm, W. (1994). Maria Montessori. In J. Houssaye (Ed.), Quinze pédagogues: Leur influence aujourd'hui (pp. 149- 166). Armand Colin.

Butler, J. (1993). Bodies That Matter. Routledge.

Candeias, A. (1994). Educar de outra forma: A escola oficina nº1 de Lisboa 1905-1930. Instituto de Inovação Educacional.

Claparède, E. (1922). Introduction. In John Dewey, L'École et l'enfant (pp. 5-37). Delachaux & Niestlé.

Claparède, E. (1953). L'école sur mesure. Delachaux & Niestlé.

Direção-Geral da Educação (2017). The Students’ Profile by the End of Compulsory Schooling. https://cidadania.dge.mec.pt/sites/default/files/pdfs/students-profile.pdf

Direção-Geral da Educação (2019). National Plan for the Arts. https://www.dge.mec.pt/sites/default/files/Projetos/PNA/Documentos/estrategia_do_plano_nacional_das_artes_2019-2024.pdf

Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and Effort in Education. The Riverside Press.

Dewey, J. (1933). Democracy and Education. Macmillan.

Eurydice (2009). Arts and Cultural Education at School in Europe.

Ferrière, A. (1921). L'autonomie des écoliers: L'art de former des citoyens pour la nation et pour l'humanité. Delachaux & Niestlé.

Ferrière, A. (1965). A escola activa. Aster.

Foucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality, Vol. I: An Introduction. Pantheon Books.

Foucault, M. (1986). History of Sexuality, Vol. 3: The Care of the Self. Pantheon Books.

Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and Punish: The birth of the prison. Vintage Books.

Foucault, M. (2000). Ethics - Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984. Penguin Books.

Gaztambide-Fernández, R. (2013). Why the arts don’t do anything: toward a new vision for cultural production in education. Harvard Educational Review, 83(1), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.83.1.a78q39699078ju20

Hall, S. (1996). Introduction: who needs ‘identity’?. In S. Hall, & P. du Gay (Eds.), Questions of cultural identity (pp. 1-17). Sage.

Harris, A. (2014). The creative turn: Toward a new aesthetic imaginary. Sense.

Hunter, I. (1996). Assembling the school. In A. Barry, T. Osborne & N. Rose (Eds.), Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism and rationalities of government (pp. 143-166). The University of Chicago Press.

Kalin, N. M. (2018). The Neoliberalization of Creativity Education, Creativity, Education and the Arts. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71525-4_1

Le Bon, G. (1924). Psychologie de l'éducation. Ernest Flammarion.

Li, X., & Auld, E. (2020). A historical perspective on the OECD’s ‘humanitarian turn’: PISA for Development and the Learning Framework 2030, Comparative Education,56:4, 503-521. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2020.1781397

Lima, A. (1925). A autonomia dos educandos e as associações escolares: As solidárias III. Educação Social, 41-42(2), 270-285

Martins C. S. (2011) As narrativas do génio e da salvação: a invenção do olhar e a fabricação da mão na educação e no ensino das artes visuais em Portugal (de finais de XVIII à primeira metade do século XX). [Doctoral dissertation, University of Lisbon]. University of Lisbon Repository. http://hdl.handle.net/10451/5733

Martins, C. S. (2020). The Fabrication of the Chameleonic Citizen of the Future through the Rhetoric of Creativity. In Art – Ethics – Education. Brill Sense. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004430716_003

OECD (2018). The Future of Education and Skills Education 2030: the future we want. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf

von Osten, M. (2012). Unpredictable Outcomes/Unpredictable Outcasts: On recent debates over creativity and the creative industries. Materia Arquitectura, (06), 85-91. http://materiaarquitectura.com/index.php/MA/article/view/246

Ó, J. R. do (2003). O Governo de Si Mesmo: Modernidade pedagógica e encenações disciplinares do aluno liceal (último quartel do século XIX- meados do século XX). Educa.

Ó, J. R. do (2019). Os sistemas de conhecimento, as modalidades de poder e as relações do eu consigo próprio: A problematização foucaultiana das práticas éticas. In F. C. S. Lemos & M. L. do Nascimento (Eds.). Biopolítica e tanatologia: A agonística dos processos de subjetivação contemporâneos (pp. 201-228). Editora CRV.

Popkewitz, T. S. (2020). The paradoxes of practical research: The good intentions of inclusion that exclude and abject. European Educational Research Journal, 19(4), 271-288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904120915391

Rancière, J. (1991). The ignorant schoolmaster: Five lessons in intellectual emancipation. Stanford University Press.

Reimer, B. (2007). Artistic Creativity, Ethics, and the Authentic Self. In L. Bresler (Ed.), International Handbook of Research in Arts Education, (pp. 1225-1228). Springer.

Reindal, S. M. (2012). Bildung, the Bologna Process and Kierkegaard’s Concept of Subjective Thinking. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 32(5), 533-549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-012-9344-1

Relyea, L. (2013). Your Everyday Art World. MIT Press.

Rose, N. (1990). Governing the soul: The shaping of private self. Routledge.

Rose, N. (1996). Inventing our selves: Psychology, power and personhood. Cambridge University Press.

Stiegler, B. (2010). Taking care of youth and the generations. Stanford University Press.

Sullivan, G. (2007). Creativity as Research Practice in the Visual Arts. In L. Bresler (Ed.), International Handbook of Research in Arts Education, (pp. 1181–1194). Springer.

Vallera, T. (2019). “Torna-te o que deves ser”: Uma história da polícia como genealogia da escola moderna (1760-1834). [Doctoral dissertation, University of Lisbon]. University of Lisbon Repository. http://hdl.handle.net/10451/41303

Vasconcelos, F. de (1915). Une école nouvelle en Belgique. Delachaux et Niestlé.

Vasconcelos, F. de (1986). Obras completas: 1900-1909. Vol. I. Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.