Conceptualization of Change
Main Article Content
Abstract
“Conceptualization of Change” is a 12-minute film that provides a theoretical reflection on the signifier “change”, and its five dimensions: Normativity, Scale and Intensity, Focus, Control and Time. Filmed in Prague, with the integration of archive material that is mostly related to the 1989 Velvet Revolution, the essay unpacks the significatory complexity of change, mapping the diversity of meanings that have been allocated to this notion. The film’s five chapters organize a dialogue between fast-paced and still poetic imaginaries and voice-overs, starting with the normativity of change, and its utopian and dystopian meanings. The Scale and Intensity chapter reflects on the sometimes minute and sometimes all-encompassing nature of change, combined with its hegemonic and counter-hegemonic roles. The Focus chapter deals with the autonomy and dependency of change, while the Control chapter focusses on how change can be controlled and controlling. Finally, the Time chapter brings in differences between process and outcome, and patterns and events. Analytically and methodologically, the film uses a post-structuralist paradigm to assist theory formation, grounded in, and combined with, an analysis of the content produced for the Mediating Change Colloquium, that took place in Prague on 20 and 21 November 2020. To render this source of inspiration and analysis visible, the film starts with a one-minute preamble, including a selection of voices from this Colloquium, in order to then shift to a more general theoretical discussion on change, with its five dimensions.
Downloads
References
Braudel, F. (1969). Écrits sur l’Histoire. Flammarion.
Carpentier, N. (2017). The Discursive-Material Knot: Cyprus in Conflict and Community Media Participation. Peter Lang.
Claeys, G. (2017). Dystopia: A Natural History: A Study of Modern Despotism, Its Antecedents, and Its Literary Diffractions. Oxford University Press.
de Certeau, M. (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life. University of California Press.
de Certeau, M. (1992). The Writing of History. Columbia University Press.
Doudaki, V., Carpentier, N., Glowacki, M. (eds.). (2022a). Mediating Change and Changing Media. Central European Journal of Communication, 15, 1(30). https://journals.ptks.pl/cejc/issue/view/vol15-no1-30-special-2022
Doudaki, V., Carpentier, N., & Glowacki, M. (2022b). Mediating Change and Changing Media: Dimensions and Perspectives. Central European Journal of Communication, 15, 1(30), 2-14. https://doi.org/10.51480/1899-5101.15.1(30).0
Herrfahrdt-Pähle, E., & Pahl-Wostl. C. (2012). Continuity and change in social-ecological systems: The role of institutional resilience. Ecology and Society, 17(2), article 8. http://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04565-170208
Laclau, E. (2000). Identity and Hegemony: The Role of Universality in the Constitution of Political Logics. In J. Butler, E. Laclau & S. Žižek (Eds.), Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left (pp. 44-89). Verso.
Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. Verso.
Latour, B. (2017). Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime. Polity.
March, J. G. (1996). Continuity and Change in Theories of Organizational Action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(2), 278–287. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393720
Schatzki, T. R. (2010). The Timespace of Human Activity: On Performance, Society, and History as Indeterminate Teleological Events. Lexington.
Servaes, J. (Ed.). (2018). Handbook of Communication for Development and Social Change. Springer.
Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012). The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How it Changes. Sage.
Thompson, W. (1997). The Left in History: Revolution and Reform in Twentieth-Century Politics. Pluto Press.
Tufte, T. (2017). Communication and Social Change: A Citizen Perspective. Polity.