Technology and self-modification: understanding technologies of the self after Foucault
Main Article Content
Abstract
Self-modification is an ancient human practice; however, for the first time in history, technology is enabling us to modify our lives not only at an existential or experiential level, but also at an informational level. This paper discusses Foucault’s concept of “technologies of the self” as well as some of its recent interpretations within contemporary philosophy of technology. It shows how ICTs have opened new dimensions for humans to transform their bodies, minds, and self-conception. It argues that while ‘traditional’ self-modification is being revolutionised and popularised by ICTs, these systems are also exposing us to potent, and unintentional forms of ontological tinkering. Ultimately, this paper shows how Foucault’s concept can serve as a valuable tool for understanding contemporary human-technology relations.
Downloads
References
Achterhuis, H. (2001). Introduction: American philosophers of technology. In H. Achterhuis (Ed.), R. P. Crease (Trans.), American philosophy of technology: The empirical turn (2d ed., pp. 1–9). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Adler, M. J., & Doren, C. V. (2006). How to read a book. New York: Simon; Schuster. (Original work published 1940)
Bakardjieva, M., & Gaden, G. (2011). Web 2.0 technologies of the self. Philosophy & Technology, 25(3), 399–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-011-0032-9
Bornstein, A. M. (2016). Is artificial intelligence permanently inscrutable? Nautilus, (16, Issue 40: Learning), 69–76. Retrieved from http://nautil.us/issue/40/learning/is-artificial-intelligence-permanently-inscrutable?utm_source=RSS_Feed
Ceglowski, M. (2016, October 29). Superintelligence: The idea that eats smart people. Idle Words. Retrieved from http://idlewords.com/talks/superintelligence.htm
Dorrestijn, S. (2012). Technical mediation and subjectivation: Tracing and extending Foucault's philosophy of technology. Philosophy & Technology, 25(2), 221–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-011-0057-0
Feyerabend, P. (1996). Theoreticians, artists and artisans. Leonardo, 29(1), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/1576272
Floridi, L. (2007). A look into the future impact of ICT on our lives. The Information Society, 23(1), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240601059094
Floridi, L. (2010). Information: A very short introduction. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780199551378.001.0001
Floridi, L. (2011a). The construction of personal identities online. Minds and Machines, 21(4), 477–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-011-9254-y
Floridi, L. (2011b). The Informational Nature of Personal Identity. Minds and Machines, 21(4), 549–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-011-9259-6
Floridi, L. (2011c). The philosophy of information. England: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199232383.001.0001
Floridi, L. (2012). The road to the philosophy of information. In H. Demir (Ed.), Luciano Floridi's philosophy of technology: Critical reflections (Vol. 8, pp. 245–271). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4292-5_13
Floridi, L. (2014). The fourth revolution: How the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Floridi, L. (2015). Singularitarians, aitheists, and why the problem with artificial intelligence is H.A.L. (humanity at large), not HAL. APA Newsletter, 14(2), 8–11.
Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. H. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16–49). Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press.
Foucault, M. (2001). Space, knowledge, power (interview with Paul Rabinow). In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), R. Hurley & others (Trans.), Essential works of foucault 1954–1984: Power (Vol. 3, pp. 349–364). New York: The New Press. (Original work published 1982)
Greenwood, V. (2017, June 30). The unbearable weirdness of CRISPR. Retrieved September 25, 2017, from http://nautil.us/blog/the-unbearable-weirdness-of-crispr
Gualeni, S. (2015). Virtual worlds as philosophical tools: How to philosophize with a digital hammer (pp. XVI, 194). London: Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137521781
Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays. (W. Lovitt, Trans.) (pp. xxxix, 182). New York; London: Garland Publishing. (Original work published 1954)
Hsu, S. (2015). Don't worry, smart machines will take us with them. Nautilus, (28, 2050), 77–80.
Ihde, D. (2009). Postphenomenology and technoscience. (L. Langsdorf, Ed.). Albany: SUNY Press.
Kiran, A. H. (2015). Four dimensions of technological mediation. In R. Rosenberger & P.-P. Verbeek (Eds.), Postphenomenological investigations: Essays on human–Technology relations (pp. 123–140). Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books.
Kittler, F. A. (1999). Gramophone, film, typewriter. (T. Lenoir & H. U. Gumbrecht, Eds., G. Winthrop-Young & M. Wutz, Trans.). California: Stanford University Press.
Latour, B. (1994). On technical mediation–Philosophy, sociology, genealogy. Common Knowledge, 3(2, Fall), 29–64. Retrieved from http://www.bruno-latour.fr/node/234
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Latour, B. (2014). Actor–Network theory (ANT). In R. C. Scharff & V. Dusek (Eds.), Philosophy of technology: The technological condition: An anthology (2d ed., Vol. 33, pp. 278–288). Reprint, Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.
Ledford, H. (2015). CRISPR, the disruptor. Nature, (522), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1038/522020a
Manovich, L. (2013). Software takes command. (F. J. Ricardo, Ed.). New York: Bloomsbury.
Martin, L. H., Gutman, H., & Hutton, P. H. (Eds.). (1988). Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault. Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press.
Merriam-Webster.com. (2017, Accessed April 19). Tinker. Retrieved, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tinker
Mitcham, C. (1994). Thinking through technology: The path between engineering and philosophy. Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago Press.
More, M., & Vita-More, N. (Eds.). (2013). The transhumanist reader. Massachusetts; Oxford: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118555927
Ortega y Gasset, J. (1966). Meditaciones del quijote. In Obras completas (7th ed., Vols. Vol. 1 (1902–1916), pp. 309–396). Madrid: Revista de Occidente. (Original work published 1914)
Ratto, M. (2011). Critical making: Conceptual and material studies in technology and social life. The Information Society, 27(4), 252–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2011.583819
Rosenberger, R., & Verbeek, P.-P. (2015). A field guide to postphenomenology. In R. Rosenberger & P.-P. Verbeek (Eds.), Postphenomenological investigations: Essays on human–Technology relations (pp. 9–41). Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books.
Shanahan, M. (2016). Conscious exotica. Aeon. Retrieved from https://aeon.co/essays/beyond-humans-what-other-kinds-of-minds-might-be-out-there
Sharon, T. (2014). Posthuman subjectivity: Beyond modern metaphysics. In Human nature in an age of biotechnology (Vol. 14, pp. 135–174). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7554-1_6
Verbeek, P.-P. (2005). What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. (R. P. Crease, Trans.). Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Verbeek, P.-P. (2011). Moralizing technology: Understanding and designing the morality of things. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226852904.001.0001