Intersectional AI is essential: polyvocal, multimodal, experimental methods to save artificial intelligence
Main Article Content
Abstract
Artificial intelligence is quietly shaping social structures and private lives. Although it promises parity and efficiency, its computational processes mirror biases of existing power even as often-proprietary data practices and cultural perceptions of computational magic obscure those influences. However, intersectionality—which foregrounds an analysis of institutional power and incorporates queer, feminist, and critical race theories—can help to rethink artificial intelligence. An intersectional framework can be used to analyze the biases and problems built into existing artificial intelligence, as well as to uncover alternative ethics from its counter-histories. This paper calls for the application of intersectional strategies to artificial intelligence at every level, from data to design to implementation, from technologist to user. Drawing on intersectional theories, the research argues these strategies are polyvocal, multimodal, and experimental—suggesting that community-focused and artistic practices can help imagine AI’s intersectional possibilities and help begin to address its biases
Downloads
References
Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., & Kirchner, L.(2016). Machine Bias. ProPublica. https://www.propublica.org/article/machinebias-risk-assessments-in-criminalsentencing
Artforum. Image Database Purges 600K Photos After Trevor Paglen Project Reveals Biases. (2019). Artforum. https://www.artforum.com/news/trevorpaglen-and-kate-crawford-s-reveals-itsracist-misogynistic-biases-imagenet-topurge-600-000-facial-images-fromdatabase-80829
Berlant, L. (2016). The commons: Infrastructures for troubling times*. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34(3), 393–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775816645989
Billard, T.J., Ciston, S., & Loup, A. (2019). Chats with diversibot: Automating the Emotional Labor of Diversifying STEM. Annenberg Graduate Research Symposium. Los Angeles. Apr 18, 2019.
Benjamin, R. (2019). Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Medford, MA: Polity.
Blackwell, K. (2018). Why People of Color Need Spaces Without White People. The Arrow: https://arrow-journal.org/why-people-ofcolor-need-spaces-without-white-people/
Buolamwini, J. (2017). How I’m fighting bias in algorithms | Joy Buolamwini. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UG_X_7g63rY
Buolamwini, J. (2018). AI, Ain’t I A Woman? - Joy Buolamwini. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QxuyfWoVV98
Cipolla, C., Gupta, K., & Rubin, D.A. (2017). Queer Feminist Science Studies: A Reader. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Chun, W. H. K. (2018). “Queerying Homophily.” Pattern Discrimination. ed. Apprich, C., Chun, W. H. K., Cramer, F., & Steyerl, H. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota Press.
Ciston, S. (2019a). ladymouth: Anti-Social-Media Art As Research. Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media & Technology, (15). https://adanewmedia.org/2019/02/issue15-ciston/
Ciston, S. (2019b). “Creative Code CollectiveIntroduction.” University of Southern California. Los Angeles. Jan 18, 2019.
Cockayne, D. G., & Richardson, L. (2017). Queering code/space: The co-production of socio-sexual codes and digital technologies. Gender, Place & Culture, 24(11), 1642–1658. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2017.1339672
Color Coded. (n.d.). Color Coded: https://colorcoded.la
Cooper, B. (2016). Intersectionality. In L. Disch & M. Hawkesworth (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Feminist Theory (Vol. 1). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199328581.013.20
Crawford, K., & Paglen, T. (2019). Excavating AI: The Politics of Images in Machine Learning Training Sets. https://www.excavating.ai
D’Ignazio, C., & Klein, L. (n.d.). Feminist Data Visualization. https://www.academia.edu/28173807/Feminist_Data_Visualization
Feminist.AI. (n.d.) https://www.feminist.ai/
Griffiths, C. (2018). Visual Tactics Toward An Ethical Debugging. Digital Culture & Society, 4(1), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.14361/dcs-2018-040112
Holland, S.,Hosny, A., Newman, S., Joseph, J., & Chmielinski, K. (2018). The Dataset Nutrition Label: A Framework To Drive Higher Data Quality Standards. ArXiv:1805.03677 [Cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1805.03z677
Keeling, K. (2014). Queer OS. Cinema Journal, 53(2), 152–157. https://doi.org/10.1353/cj.2014.0004
Mahmood, Z., & Piepzna-Samarasinha, L. L. (2008). All Our Holes Are Hungry: Hungry for Justice and Fucking. Femme Shark Communique, (1). http://archive.qzap.org/index.php/Detail/Object/Show/object_id/432
Meinders, C. (2019). Personal correspondence.
Niesen, M. (2016). Love, Inc.: Toward Structural Intersectional Analysis of Online Dating Sites and Applications. In Digital Formations, Vol. 105. The intersectional Internet: Race, sex, class and culture online (pp. 161–178). New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism.
Parisi, L. (2017). Reprogramming Decisionism. E-Flux, Journal #85. http://www.eflux.com/journal/85/155472/reprogramming -decisionism/
Roberts, S. T. (2016). Commercial Content Moderation: Digital Laborers’ Dirty Work. In Digital Formations, Vol. 105. The intersectional Internet: Race, sex, class and culture online (pp. 147–160). New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
Sweeney, M. E. (2016). The Intersectional Interface. In Digital Formations, Vol. 105. The intersectional Internet: Race, sex, class and culture online (pp. 215–228). New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
Sweeney, M. E., & Brock, A. (2014). Critical informatics: New methods and practices. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 51(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2014.14505101032
Tynes, B. M., Schuschke, J., & Noble, S. U. (2016). Digital Intersectionality Theory and the #Blacklivesmatter Movement. In Digital Formations, Vol. 105. The intersectional Internet: Race, sex, class and culture online (pp. 21–40). New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
Washington, M. S. (2017). Blasian invasion: Racial mixing in the celebrity industrial complex. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.
Wilson, E. A. (2011). Affect and Artificial Intelligence. Seattle: U of Washington P