Questions that Have Arisen since the EU Decision on the Whatsapp Acquisition by Facebook
Main Article Content
Abstract
On October 3rd, 2014, the European Commission (EC) concluded the analysis of the transaction by which Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”, USA) had acquired WhatsApp Inc. (“WhatsApp”, USA) by way of a purchase of shares for US$ 19 billion, which contributed to Facebook’s strategy of focusing its business on mobile development (Case no. COMP/M.7217). In its decision, the EC stated that the deal would raise no competition concerns and authorised the proposed acquisition of WhatsApp by Facebook concluding that Facebook Messenger and WhatsApp are not close competitors and that consumers would continue to have a wide choice of alternatives for consumer communication apps after the acquisition. The EC analysed potential data concentration issues only within the scope that the acquisition could weigh down competition in the online advertising market. Privacy-related concerns from the increased concentration of data within the control of Facebook because of the deal with WhatsApp are not an EU Competition Law matter. Notwithstanding, just some months after the decision two national competition authorities (Germany and Italy) opened procedures against Facebook. In Germany, the Bundeskartellamt initiated in March 2016 a proceeding against Facebook – Facebook Inc., USA, the Irish subsidiary of the company, and Facebook Germany GmbH, Hamburg – on suspicion that Facebook had abused its market power by infringing data protection rules with its specific terms of service on the use of user data. In Italy, in May 2017, the Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM) fined WhatsApp EUR 3 million for having forced its users to share their personal data with Facebook as a conclusion of two investigations opened in October 2016 concerning infringements of the Consumer Code. The present article proposes to answer three main questions concerning the EC decision on the WhatsApp acquisition by Facebook: (i) Did the EC apply the best tools to analyse the case?; (ii) Could the EC have addressed a decision that would somehow interfere in the privacy field?; and (iii) Could the procedures in Germany and Italy have been avoided?
Downloads
References
Agnellutti, C. Big Data: An Exploration of Opportunities, Values and Privacy Issues. New York: Nova Science Pub Inc., 2014.
Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato. “PS11112 – Uso dei dati degli utenti a fini commerciali: sanzioni per 10 milioni di euro a Facebook”, 2018, datAllegatinews/PS11112. Accessed December 17, 2018. http://www.agcm.it/dotcmsdoc/allegatinews/PS11112_scorr_sanz.pdf.
Autorité de la Concurrence and Bundeskartellamt. Competition Law and Data. May, 2016, 3. http://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Publikation/DE/Berichte/Big%20Data%20Papier.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2.
Bagnoli, V. “Competition for the effectiveness of big data benefits”. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 46, no. 6 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-015-0382-4
Bagnoli, V. “The big data relevant market”. Concorrenza e Mercato 23 (2016), special number Big Data e Concorrenza.
“Big data: Interim report in the context of the joint inquiry on ‘Big data’ launched by the AGCOM deliberation No. 217/17 / CONS17”. 2018. Accessed November 27. 2018. https://www.agcom.it/documents/10179/10875949/Allegato+4-9-2018/f9befcb1-4706-4daa-ad38-c0d767add5fd?version=1.0, III.
“Bundeskartellamt initiates proceeding against Facebook on suspicion of having abused its market power by infringing data protection rules”, 2016, Pressemitteilungen/2016/02_03_2016. Accessed December 26, 2018. http://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Meldung/EN/Pressemitteilungen/2016/02_03_2016_Facebook.html?nn=3599398.
“Bundeskartellamt prohibits Facebook from combining user data from different sources”, 2019. in https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Publikation/EN/Pressemitteilungen/2019/07_02_2019_Facebook.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2
Chen, M., Mao, S., Zhang, Y. and Leung, V. C. M. Big Data: Related Technologies, Challenges and Future Prospects. London: Springer, 2014.
Commission decision of 6 October 2014, pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation No. 139/2004, Case no. COMP/M.7217, Facebook/WhatsApp. http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/decisions/m7217_20141003_20310_3962132_EN.pdf.
Craig, T., Ludloff, M. E. Privacy and Big Data. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly, 2011.
Cumbley, R., Church, P. “Is big data creepy?”. Computer Law & Security Review 29, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2013.07.007
Drexl, J. Data Access and Control in the Era of Connected Devices Study on Behalf of the European Consumer Organisation. Brussels: BEUC, 2018.
Drexl, J., et al. Position Statement of the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition of 26 April 2017 on the European Commission’s “Public consultation on Building the European Data Economy”.
European Data Protection Board. “Statement of the EDPB on the data protection impacts of economic concentration”, 2018. Accessed December 26, 2018. https://edpb.europa.eu/sites/edpb/files/files/file1/edpb_statement_economic_concentration_en.pdf.
European Data Protection Supervisor. “Preliminary Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor. Privacy and Competitiveness in the Age of Big Data. The interplay between data protection, competition law and consumer protection in the Digital Economy”, 2014. Accessed December 26, 2018. https://edps.europa.eu/sites/edp/files/publication/14-03-26_competitition_law_big_data_en.pdf.
European Data Protection Supervisor. “Report of EDPS workshop on privacy, consumers, competition and big data”, 2014. Accessed December 26, 2018. https://edps.europa.eu/data-protection/our-work/publications/reports/report-edps-workshop-privacy-consumers-competition-and_en.
“Facebook fined 10 million Euros by the ICA for unfair commercial practices for using its subscribers’ data for commercial purposes”, 2018, Press-releases/2018/12. Accessed December 17, 2018. http://en.agcm.it/en/media/press-releases/2018/12/Facebookfined-10-million-Euros-by-the-ICA-for-unfair-commercial-practices-for-using-itssubscribers%E2%80%99-data-for-commercial-purposes.
“Facebook used people’s data to favor certain partners and punish rivals, documents show.” The NY Times, December 05, 2018. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/05/technology/facebook-documents-uk-parliament.html.
Fishleigh, J. A Non-Technical Journey into the World of Big Data: An Introduction. Cambridge: Legal Information Management, 2014.
Frank, J. S. “Competition concerns in multi-sided markets in mobile communication”. In G. Surblyté. Competition on the Internet. MPI Studies on Intellectual Property and Competition Law, vol. 23. Berlin: Springer, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55096-6_7
Graef, I. “Market definition and market power in data: The case of online platforms”. World Competition 38, no. 4 (2015): 473-506.
“Mergers: Commission approves acquisition of WhatsApp by Facebook”, 2014, under “Press Release Database”, Press-release_IP-14-1088. Accessed June 01, 2018. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-14-1088_en.htm.
“Mergers: Commission fines Facebook €110 million for providing misleading information about WhatApp takeover”, 2017, under “Press Release Database”, Press-release_IP-17-1369. Accessed November 11, 2018. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-17-1369_en.htm.
“Mergers: Commission opens in depth investigation into Apple’s proposed acquisition of Shazam”, 2018, under “Press Release Database”, Press-release_IP-18-3505. Accessed December 26, 2018. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-18-3505_en.htm.
Mayer-Schönberger, V., Ramge, T. Reinventing Capitalism in the Age of Big Data. New York: Basic Books, 2018.
McKinsey Global Institute. “Big Data: The Next Frontier for Innovation, Competition, and Productivity, May 2011, Report”, 2011, https://www.mckinsey.com/businessfunctions/digital-mckinsey/our-insights/big-data-the-next-frontier-for-innovation.
Moon, H. and Cho, H.S. “Big data and policy design for data sovereignty: A case study on copyright and CCL in South Korea”. Social Com, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/socialcom.2013.165
Mundt, Andreas. “Sixty years and still exciting: The Bundeskartellamt in the digital era”. Journal of Antitrust Enforcement 6, no. 1 (2018). https://academic.oup.com/antitrust/article/6/1/1/4904570. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaenfo/jny002
OECD. Data-Driven Innovation: Big Data for Growth and Well-Being. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264229358-en
OECD. The Digital Economy, 2012.
Pitruzzella, G. “Big data, competition and privacy: A look from the antitrust perspective”. Concorrenza e Mercato 23 (2016), special edition Big Data e Concorrenza.
“Preliminary assessment in Facebook proceeding: Facebook’s collection and use of data from third-praty sources is abusive”, 2017, Pressemitteilungen/2017/19_12_2017. Accessed July 14, 2018. https://www.bundeskartellamt.de/SharedDocs/Meldung/EN/Pressemitteilungen/2017/19_12_2017_Facebook.html?nn=3591568.
Shafer, T. “The 42 Vs of big data and data science”. Elder Research – Data Science and Predictive Analytics. https://www.elderresearch.com/company/blog/42-v-of-big-data.
Statement of the EDPB on the data protection impacts of economic concentration. Accessed December 26, 2018. https://edpb.europa.eu/sites/edpb/files/files/file1/edpb_statement_economic_concentration_en.pdf.
“Tech’s frightful five: They’ve got us”. The NY Times, May 30, 2017. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/10/technology/techs-frightful-five-theyve-got-us.html?_r=0.
“The next capitalist revolution”. The Economist, November 15, 2018. https://www.economist.com/leaders/2018/11/15/the-next-capitalist-revolution?cid1=cust/ednew/n/bl/n/2018/11/15n/owned/n/n/nwl/n/n/LA/167098/n.
The White House: Executive Office of the President. Big Data: Seizing Opportunities, Preserving Values, 2014.
“The world’s most valuable resource is no longer oil, but data”, The Economist, May 6, 2017. Accessed May 21, 2017. http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21721656-data-economy-demands-new-approach-antitrust-rules-worlds-most-valuableresource.
Vezzoso, S. “Internet competition and e-books: Challenging the competition policy acquis?” In G. Surblyté. Competition on the Internet. MPI Studies on Intellectual Property and Competition Law, vol. 23. Berlin: Springer, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55096-6_3
Vezzoso, S. “Pro-competitive regulation of personal data protection in the EU”. In J. Drexl; V. Bagnoli. State-Initiated Restraints of Competition. Cheltenham: Edward Elgard, 2015. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784714987.00018
“WhatsApp fined for 3 million euro for having forced its users to share their personal data with Facebook”, 2017, Press-releases/2380. Accessed June 06, 2017. http://www.agcm.it/en/newsroom/press-releases/2380-WhatsApp-fined-for-3-million-euro-forhaving-forced-its-users-to-share-their-personal-data-with-facebook.html.