Adaptação cultural, validade e fiabilidade da escala pessoal de resultados-crianças e jovens
Main Article Content
Resumo
A presente investigação apresenta os resultados de um estudo piloto que tem como objetivos efetuar a adaptação cultural da Escala Pessoal de Resultados-Crianças e Jovens (EPR-CJ), bem como examinar a sua validade e fiabilidade. Esta escala possibilita avaliar a Qualidade de Vida (QV) das crianças e jovens com Dificuldade Intelectual (DI). Das diferentes amostras englobadas nesta investigação, salienta-se que a amostra final incluiu 54 crianças e jovens com DI e 54 profissionais de educação. O estudo iniciou com a aplicação das diretrizes internacionais relativas à adaptação cultural. Os resultados do Índice de Validade de Conteúdo (IVC) dos itens, do acordo universal do IVC do instrumento, da média do IVC da escala e dos valores do Kappa de Cohen suportaram a validade de conteúdo, tendo as correlações de Pearson reforçado a validade de constructo da EPR-CJ. Os valores do teste-reteste, da consistência interna e do acordo entre observadores sustentaram a fiabilidade do instrumento. Os diferentes coeficientes psicométricos ilustraram que esta escala pode ser bastante útil para a avaliação da QV das crianças e jovens com DI, sendo a EPR-CJ crucial para desenhar os programas de intervenção destes alunos em contextos inclusivos de aprendizagem.
Downloads
Referências
American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2014). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Andresen, E. (2000). Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81(2), S15–S20. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2000.20619
Araújo, J., Dourado, M., & Ferreira, P. (2015). Instrumentos de medição da qualidade de vida em idade pediátrica em cuidados paliativos. Acta Médica Portuguesa, 28, 501–512. https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.5395
Brown, I. (2017). Quality of life: Challenges to research, practice and policy. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 14(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12185
Buntinx, W., & Schalock, R. (2010). Models of disability, quality of life, and individualized supports: Implications for professional practice in intellectual disability. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 7(4), 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-1130.2010.00278.x
Claes, C., Mostert, R., Moonen, L., Van Loon, J., & Schalock, R. (2015). Personal Outcomes Scale for Children and Adolescents: Instrument for the assessment of individual quality of life of children and adolescents between the ages of 6-18. Ghent, Belgium: Stichting Arduin.
Claes, C., Van Hove, G., Vandevelde, S., Van Loon, J., & Schalock, R. (2010a). Person-centered planning: An analysis of its published literature and effectiveness. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 48(6), 432–453. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-48.6.432
Claes, C., Van Hove, G., Van Loon, J., Vandevelde, S., & Schalock, R. (2010b). Quality of life measurement in the field of intellectual disabilities: Eight principles for assessing quality of life-related personal outcomes. Social Indicators Research, 98(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9517-7
DeVon, H., Block, M., Moyle-Wright, P., Ernst, D., Hayden, S., Lazzara D., ... Kostas-Polston, E. (2007). A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 39(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2007.00161.x
Gaspar, T., & Matos, M. (2008). Qualidade de vida em crianças e adolescentes: Versão portuguesa dos instrumentos Kidscreen-52. Cruz Quebrada, Portugal: Aventura Social e Saúde.
Ghotra, S., McIsaac, J., Kirk, S., & Kuhle, S. (2016). Validation of the ‘Quality of Life in School’ instrument in Canadian elementary school students. PeerJ, 4, e1567. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1429v1
Gómez, L., Verdugo, M., Arias, B., & Arias, V. (2011). A comparison of alternative models of individual quality of life for social service recipients. Social Indicators Research, 101(1), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9639-y
Hartley, S., & MacLean, W. (2006). A review of the reliability and validity of Likert-type scales for people with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 50(11), 813–827. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2006.00844.x
Huang, C., Wang, T., Tang, F., Chen, I., & Yu, S. (2017). Development and validation of a Quality of Life Scalefor elementary school students. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 17(2), 180–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2017.01.001
Karr, V. (2011). A life of quality: Informing the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 22(2), 66–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207310392785
Li, C., Tsoi, E., Zhang, A., Chen, S., & Wang, C. (2013). Psychometric properties of self-reported quality of life measures for people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 25(2), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-012-9297-x
Luckasson, R., Borthwick-Duffy, S., Buntinx, W., Coulter, D., Craig, E., Reeve, A., … Tassé, M. (2002). Mental retardation: Definition, classification, and systems of supports (10th ed.). Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
Lombardi, M., Croce, L., Claes, C., Vandevelde, S., & Schalock, R. (2016). Factors predicting quality of life for people with intellectual disability: Results from the ANFFAS study in Italy. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 41(4), 338–347. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2016.1223281
Morato, P., & Santos, S. (2007). Dificuldades intelectuais e desenvolvimentais: A mudança de paradigma na conceção da deficiência mental. Revista de Educação Especial e Reabilitação, 14(1), 51–55.
Nações Unidas. (2007). Convenção sobre os direitos das pessoas com deficiência. Lisboa, Portugal: Instituto Nacional para a Reabilitação. Disponível em http://www.inr.pt/content/1/50/organizacao-das-nacoes-unidas, consultado em 07/07/2018.
Nilholm, C., & K., Göransson (2017). “What is meant by inclusion? An analysis of European and North American journal articles with high impact.” European Journal of Special Needs Education, 32(3), 437–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2017.1295638.
Oliveira, O., Ribeiro, C., Simões, C., & Pereira, P. (2018). Quality of life of children and adolescents with visual impairment. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 36(1), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619617737123
Pestana, M., & Gageiro, J. (2005). Análise de dados para ciências sociais: A complementaridade do SPSS. Lisboa, Portugal: Edições Sílabo.
Polit, D., & Beck, C. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
Rodrigues, D. (2003). Educação inclusiva: As boas e as más notícias. In D. Rodrigues (Org.), Perspectivas sobre a inclusão da educação à sociedade (pp. 89–101). Porto: Porto Editora.
Rodrigues, D., & Nogueira, J. (2010). Educação especial e inclusiva em Portugal: Factos e opções. Revista Educación Inclusiva, 3(1), 97–109.
Schalock, R., Brown, I., Brown, R., Cummins, R., Felce, D., Matikka, … Parmenter, T. (2002). Conceptualization, measurement and application of quality of life for persons with intellectual disabilities: Report of an international panel of experts. Mental Retardation, 40(6), 457–470. https://doi.org/10.1352/0047-6765(2002)040<0457:CMAAOQ>2.0.CO;2
Schalock, R., Buntinx, W., Borthwick-Duffy, S., Luckasson, R., Snell, M., Tassé, M., & Wehmeyer, M. (2007). User’s guide-mental retardation: Definition, classification and systems of supports (10th ed.). Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual Disability.
Schalock, R., Gardner, J., & Bradley, V. (2007). Quality of life for people with intellectual and other developmental disabilities: Applications across individuals, organizations, communities, and systems. Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual Disability.
Schalock, R., Luckasson, R., Tassé, M., & Verdugo, M. (2018). A holistic theoretical approach to intellectual disability: Going beyond the four current perspectives. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 56(2), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-56.2.79
Schalock, R., & Verdugo, M. (2002). Handbook on quality of life for human service practitioners. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
Schalock, R., Verdugo, M., & Gómez, L. (2011). Evidence-based practices in the field of intellectual and developmental disabilities: An international consensus approach. Evaluation and Program Planning, 34(3), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.10.004
Schalock, R., Verdugo, M., Gómez, L., & Reinders, H. (2016). Moving us toward a theory of individual quality of life. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 121(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-121.1.1
Simões, C., & Santos, S. (2014). Cross-cultural adaptation, validity and reliability of the Escala Pessoal de Resultados. Social Indicators Research, 119(2), 1065–1077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0515-4
Simões, C., & Santos, S. (2017). The impact of personal and environmental characteristics on quality of life of people with intellectual disability. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 12(2), 389–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-016-9466-7
Simões, C., & Santos, S. (2018). Qualidade de vida, comportamento adaptativo e apoios: Compreender a relação entre constructos na dificuldade intelectual e desenvolvimental. Cruz Quebrada: Edições Faculdade de Motricidade Humana.
Simões, C., Santos, S., & Biscaia, R. (2016). Validation of the Portuguese version of the Personal Outcomes Scale. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 16(2), 186–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.11.002
Simões, C., Santos, S., Biscaia, R., & Thompson, J. (2016). Understanding the relationship between quality of life, adaptive behavior and support needs. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 28, 849–870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-016-9514-0
Simões, C., Santos, S., & Claes, C. (2015a). Quality of life assessment in intellectual disabilities: The Escala Pessoal de Resultados versus the World Health Quality of Life-BREF. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 37(2), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.11.010
Simões, C., Santos, S., & Claes, C. (2015b). The Portuguese version of Personal Outcomes Scale: A psychometric validity and reliability study. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 53(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-53.2.129
Simões, C., Santos, S., Claes, C., Van Loon, J., & Schalock, R. (2017). Avaliação da qualidade de vida na dificuldade intelectual e desenvolvimental: Manual de administração da Escala Pessoal de Resultados. Coimbra: FORMEM.
Verdugo, M., Navas, P., Gómez, L., & Schalock, R. (2012). The concept of quality of life and its role in enhancing human rights in the field of intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56(11), 1036–1045. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01585.x
Watkins, M., & Pacheco, M. (2000). Interobserver agreement in behavioral research: Importance and calculation. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10(4), 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012295615144
World Medical Association. (2008). Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Disponível em http://www.bioetica.ufrgs.br/helsin7.pdf, consultado em 26/04/2012.
Wynd, C., Schmidt, B., & Schaefer, M. (2003). Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25(5), 508–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945903252998
Yaghmaie, F. (2003). Content validity and its estimation. Journal of Medical Education Spring, 3(1), 25–27. https://doi.org/10.22037/jme.v3i1.870