Evidence in International Arbitration: Admissibility, Relevance and Differences between Common and Civil Law
Main Article Content
Resumo
A arbitragem é uma forma de resolução alternativa de litígios. Os tribunais arbitrais não estão geralmente vinculados à observância de regras legais que versem sobre os meios de obtenção da prova e sobre o valor probatório dos diversos meios de prova. Em face do vazio legal no que respeita à prova na arbitragem internacional, analisam-se as regras que versam sobre os meios de obtenção e a valoração da prova nos tribunais arbitrais. Neste artigo, procura avaliar-se a admissibilidade e o valor da prova na arbitragem internacional. Paralelamente, procura estabelecer-se as diferenças existentes a nível procedimental nas jurisdições de Civil e Common Law, bem como assinalar o efeito prático e as implicações dessas mesmas diferenças.
Downloads
Referências
Blackaby, Nigel et al., 2015, Redfern and Hunter On International Arbitration, 6.o ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Born, Gary, 2014, International Commercial Arbitration, 2.o ed., Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn.
Briner, Robert, 1997, “Domestic Arbitration: Practice in Continental Europe and Its Lessons for Arbitration in England”, Arbitration International, vol. 13, number 2. https://doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/13.2.155
Brown, David, 2004, “Oral evidence and experts in arbitration” in Arbitration and Oral Evidence, Levy, L and Veeder, ICC Publishing.
Crawford, 2010, “Advocacy Before the International Court of Justice and Other International Tribunals in State-to-State Cases”, in The Art of Advocacy in International Arbitration, R. Bishop & E. Kehoe.
De Boisseson, M, 1990, “Comparative Introduction to the Systems of Producing Evidence in Common Law Countries and the Countries from Roman Law Tradition” in International Chamber of Commerce, Taking of Evidence in International Arbitration Proceedings, ICC Publishing SA.
Holtzmann, Howard M., 1991, “Fact-Finding By The Iran–United States Claims Tribunal” in Fact-Finding before International Tribunals: Eleventh Sokol Colloquium, Transnational, New York.
Holtzmann, Howard, 1995, “Streamlining arbitral proceedings: Some techniques of the Iran–United States Claims Tribunal”, Arbitration International, vol. 11, number 1. https://doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/11.1.39
Hong, Sik Chung, 2011, “Taking of Evidence In International Arbitration Procedure – Focusing On 2010 IBA Rules On The Taking Of Evidence In International Arbitration”, Journal of Arbitration Studies, vol. 21, number 3. https://doi.org/10.16998/jas.2011.21.3.21
Karrer, Pierre, 2010, “The Civil Law and Common Law divide: An international arbitrator tells it like he sees it” in American Arbitration Association, Handbook on International Arbitration and ADR, Thomas E. Carbonneau, 2.o ed., Juris, New York.
Kern, 2010, Internationale Schiedsverfahren zwischen Civil Law und Common Law, 109 VglWiss 78.
Kubalczyk, Anna, 2015, “Evidentiary Rules In International Arbitration – A Comparative Analysis Of Approaches And The Need For Regulation”, Groningen Journal of International Law, vol. 3, number 1. https://doi.org/10.21827/5a86a88ce5edd
Laeuchli, Urs, 2010, “Civil and Common Law Contrast and Synthesis in International Arbitration” in Handbook on International Arbitration Practice, American Arbitration Association, Juris, New York.
Pietrowski, Robert, 2006, “Evidence In International Arbitration”, Arbitration International, vol. 22, number 3.
Pilkov, Konstantin, 2014, “Evidence In International Arbitration: Criteria For Admission And Evaluation”, Arbitration, vol. 80, number 11.
Reymond et al., 1994, “The standards and burden of proof in international arbitration”, Arbitration International, vol. 10, number 3.
Reymond, Claude, 1989, “Civil Law And Common Law Procedures: Which Is The More Inquisitorial? A Civil Lawyer’s Response”, Arbitration International, vol. 5, number 4. https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/5.4.357
Rubino-Sammartano, M, 1989, International Arbitration Law, 1.o ed., Springer, Netherlands.
Saleh, Samir, 1999, “Reflections On Admissibility Of Evidence: Interrelation Between Domestic Law And International Arbitration”, Arbitration International, vol. 15, number 2. https://doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/15.2.141
Salomon, Claudia, 2003, “Submitting Evidence In An International Arbitration: The Common Lawyer’s Guide”, Journal of International Arbitration, vol. 20, number 3.
Smith, Robert, 1996, “Roles of the Arbitral Tribunal in Civil Law and Common Law Systems with Respect to Presentation of Evidence” in Planning Efficient Arbitration Proceedings: The Law Applicable in International Arbitration, AJ
Van den Berg, vol. 7, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn. Straus, Michael, 1986, “The practice of the Iran–US Claims Tribunal in receivingevidence from parties and from experts”, Journal of International Arbitration, vol. 57, number 3.
Veeder, 2008, “Whose Arbitration Is It Anyway: The Parties or the Arbitration Tribunal – An Interesting Question?”, in The Leading Arbitrators’ Guide to International Arbitration, L. Newman & R. Hill.
Vercauteren, Laurent, 2012, “Note and Comment: The Taking of Documentary Evidence in International Arbitration”, The American Review of International Arbitration, vol. 23, number 1.
Waincymer, Jeffrey, 2012, “Approaches to Evidence and Fact Finding” in Procedure and Evidence in International Arbitration, Jeffrey Waincymer, Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn.